Is MS or QCOM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MS is cheaper: MS trades at a 19.82 P/E and QCOM at 23.69.

Which has grown faster, MS or QCOM?

Over the past five years, MS grew revenue faster — MS at a 17.47% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.

Does MS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

MS yields 1.84% and QCOM yields 1.63% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MS or QCOM more profitable?

QCOM runs the higher net margin — MS at 15.13% versus QCOM at 22.31%.

Which has been the better investment, MS or QCOM?

Over the past 10-year, MS delivered the higher annualized total return — MS at 27.88% versus QCOM at 18.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Morgan Stanley (MS) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

MS leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Morgan Stanley and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Morgan Stanley

$348.82B

$217.98Financial Services

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$233.74B

$220.81Technology

Total return — MS vs QCOM

growth of $100 · last 30y

MS +1653.7%QCOM +7522.3%QCOM compounded faster

MS QCOM

MS vs QCOM: by the numbers

•MS is the larger company ($348.82B vs $233.74B market cap).
•MS trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.82 vs 23.69 P/E).
•QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 15.13% net margin).
•MS grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.47% vs 8.63% CAGR).
•MS pays the higher dividend yield (1.84% vs 1.63%).

Which is better, MS or QCOM?

Metric tally: MS 10 · QCOM 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMS(lower P/E)

GrowthMS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMS(higher dividend yield)

QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MS	QCOM
P/E ratio	19.82●	23.69
Forward P/E	18.33●	20.57
P/S ratio	2.89●	5.32
P/B ratio	3.04●	8.68
PEG ratio	0.58●	4.13
EV / EBITDA	—	17.39
FCF yield	—	5.28%

Profitability

Metric	MS	QCOM
Gross margin	57.99%●	54.80%
Operating margin	19.48%	25.52%●
Net margin	15.13%	22.31%●
ROE	15.91%	36.38%●
ROIC	1.69%	13.15%●

Dividends

Metric	MS	QCOM
Dividend yield	1.84%●	1.63%
Payout ratio	38.68%	70.95%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MS	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.47%●	8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.56%●	5.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	23.31%●	12.95%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MS or QCOM?: It depends on your goal. value: MS (lower P/E); growth: MS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MS (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MS leads 10 to 4.
Is MS or QCOM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MS is cheaper: MS trades at a 19.82 P/E and QCOM at 23.69.
Which has grown faster, MS or QCOM?: Over the past five years, MS grew revenue faster — MS at a 17.47% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does MS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: MS yields 1.84% and QCOM yields 1.63% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MS or QCOM more profitable?: QCOM runs the higher net margin — MS at 15.13% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
Which has been the better investment, MS or QCOM?: Over the past 10-year, MS delivered the higher annualized total return — MS at 27.88% versus QCOM at 18.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MS analysis Full QCOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Morgan Stanley P/E ratio QUALCOMM P/E ratio Morgan Stanley dividend yield QUALCOMM dividend yield Morgan Stanley ROE QUALCOMM ROE Morgan Stanley operating margin QUALCOMM operating margin Morgan Stanley revenue growth QUALCOMM revenue growth Morgan Stanley free cash flow QUALCOMM free cash flow

Morgan Stanley & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.