Which has the lower trailing P/E, MRTN or PSIX?

PSIX has the lower trailing P/E: MRTN trades at 83.38 and PSIX at 16.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MRTN or PSIX?

Over the past five years, PSIX grew revenue faster — MRTN at a 0.21% CAGR versus PSIX at 9.42%.

Does MRTN or PSIX pay a bigger dividend?

MRTN pays a dividend (1.84% yield), while PSIX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MRTN or PSIX more profitable?

PSIX runs the higher net margin — MRTN at 1.47% versus PSIX at 10.03%.

How have MRTN and PSIX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MRTN delivered 5.85% and PSIX delivered 15.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Marten Transport, Ltd. (MRTN) vs Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX)

A side-by-side comparison of Marten Transport, Ltd. and Power Solutions International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MRTN

Marten Transport, Ltd.

$1.06B

$12.94IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

PSIX

Power Solutions International, Inc.

$1.12B

$48.65IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

Total return — MRTN vs PSIX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MRTN +76.6% (+5.9%/yr)PSIX +309.0% (+15.1%/yr)PSIX compounded faster over this window

MRTN PSIX

MRTN vs PSIX: by the numbers

•PSIX is the larger company ($1.12B vs $1.06B market cap).
•PSIX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.49 vs 83.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PSIX converts more revenue to profit (10.03% vs 1.47% net margin).
•PSIX grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.42% vs 0.21% CAGR).
•MRTN pays a dividend (1.84% yield), while PSIX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MRTN	PSIX
P/E ratio	83.38	16.49
Forward P/E	47.34	16.62
P/S ratio	1.23	1.66
P/B ratio	1.38	5.52
EV / EBITDA	9.42	12.39
FCF yield	0.12%	5.98%

Profitability

Metric	MRTN	PSIX
Gross margin	1.21%	23.73%
Operating margin	0.08%	13.00%
Net margin	1.47%	10.03%
ROE	1.65%	33.41%
ROIC	0.06%	21.64%

Dividends

Metric	MRTN	PSIX
Dividend yield	1.84%	N/A
Payout ratio	154.64%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MRTN	PSIX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.21%	9.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-24.22%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.88%	58.06%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MRTN or PSIX?: PSIX has the lower trailing P/E: MRTN trades at 83.38 and PSIX at 16.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MRTN or PSIX?: Over the past five years, PSIX grew revenue faster — MRTN at a 0.21% CAGR versus PSIX at 9.42%.
Does MRTN or PSIX pay a bigger dividend?: MRTN pays a dividend (1.84% yield), while PSIX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MRTN or PSIX more profitable?: PSIX runs the higher net margin — MRTN at 1.47% versus PSIX at 10.03%.
How have MRTN and PSIX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MRTN delivered 5.85% and PSIX delivered 15.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MRTN analysis Full PSIX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Marten Transport P/E ratio Power Solutions International P/E ratio Marten Transport dividend yield Marten Transport ROE Power Solutions International ROE Marten Transport operating margin Power Solutions International operating margin Marten Transport revenue growth Power Solutions International revenue growth Marten Transport free cash flow Power Solutions International free cash flow

Marten Transport & Power Solutions International appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.