Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) vs U.S. Bancorp (USB)
USB leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$164.22Financial Services
USB
U.S. Bancorp
$58.89Financial Services
Total return — MRSH vs USB
growth of $100 · last 30yMRSH +943.9%USB +693.7%MRSH compounded faster
MRSH USB
MRSH vs USB: by the numbers
- •USB is the larger company ($91.41B vs $79.12B market cap).
- •USB trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.37 vs 20.53 P/E).
- •USB converts more revenue to profit (18.02% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •USB grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.25% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •USB pays the higher dividend yield (3.50% vs 2.19%).
Which is better, MRSH or USB?
Metric tally: MRSH 4 · USB 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUSB(lower P/E)
GrowthUSB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUSB(higher dividend yield)
QualityMRSH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MRSH | USB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.53 | 12.37● |
| Forward P/E | 15.79 | 11.55● |
| P/S ratio | 2.90 | 2.11● |
| P/B ratio | 5.48 | 1.39● |
| PEG ratio | 7.79 | 0.50● |
Profitability
| Metric | MRSH | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 42.37% | 62.81%● |
| Operating margin | 21.70% | 23.18%● |
| Net margin | 14.26% | 18.02%● |
| ROE | 26.94%● | 11.87% |
| ROIC | 12.12%● | 4.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | MRSH | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 3.50%● |
| Payout ratio | 42.45% | 44.59% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MRSH | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.28% | 12.25%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.34%● | 8.59% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.30%● | 4.57% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MRSH or USB?
- It depends on your goal. value: USB (lower P/E); growth: USB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: USB (higher dividend yield); quality: MRSH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, USB leads 10 to 4.
- Is MRSH or USB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, USB is cheaper: MRSH trades at a 20.53 P/E and USB at 12.37.
- Which has grown faster, MRSH or USB?
- Over the past five years, USB grew revenue faster — MRSH at a 9.28% CAGR versus USB at 12.25%.
- Does MRSH or USB pay a bigger dividend?
- MRSH yields 2.19% and USB yields 3.50% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MRSH or USB more profitable?
- USB runs the higher net margin — MRSH at 14.26% versus USB at 18.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, MRSH or USB?
- Over the past 10-year, MRSH delivered the higher annualized total return — MRSH at 11.42% versus USB at 7.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Marsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioU.S. Bancorp P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldU.S. Bancorp dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEU.S. Bancorp ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginU.S. Bancorp operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthU.S. Bancorp revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flowU.S. Bancorp free cash flow
Marsh & McLennan Companies & U.S. Bancorp appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.