MetLife, Inc. (MET) vs Truist Financial Corporation (TFC)
TFC leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of MetLife, Inc. and Truist Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$88.84Financial Services
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
$51.66Financial Services
Total return — MET vs TFC
growth of $100 · last 26yMET +576.1%TFC +78.5%MET compounded faster
MET TFC
MET vs TFC: by the numbers
- •TFC is the larger company ($64.36B vs $57.16B market cap).
- •TFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.28 vs 17.22 P/E).
- •TFC converts more revenue to profit (18.14% vs 4.70% net margin).
- •TFC grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.16% vs 3.40% CAGR).
- •TFC pays the higher dividend yield (4.03% vs 2.58%).
Which is better, MET or TFC?
Metric tally: MET 6 · TFC 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTFC(lower P/E)
GrowthTFC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTFC(higher dividend yield)
QualityTFC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MET | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.22 | 13.28● |
| Forward P/E | 8.96● | 11.37 |
| P/S ratio | 0.76● | 2.15 |
| P/B ratio | 2.13 | 1.02● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.50● | 18.63 |
| FCF yield | 28.41%● | 8.67% |
Profitability
| Metric | MET | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 28.40% | 62.92%● |
| Operating margin | 6.26% | 21.35%● |
| Net margin | 4.70% | 18.14%● |
| ROE | 13.24%● | 8.61% |
| ROIC | 0.72% | 3.61%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MET | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 4.03%● |
| Payout ratio | 47.81% | 53.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MET | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.40% | 5.16%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.45% | 4.42%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.18% | 19.52%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.03%● | 2.51% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MET or TFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: TFC (lower P/E); growth: TFC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TFC (higher dividend yield); quality: TFC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TFC leads 10 to 6.
- Is MET or TFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TFC is cheaper: MET trades at a 17.22 P/E and TFC at 13.28.
- Which has grown faster, MET or TFC?
- Over the past five years, TFC grew revenue faster — MET at a 3.40% CAGR versus TFC at 5.16%.
- Does MET or TFC pay a bigger dividend?
- MET yields 2.58% and TFC yields 4.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MET or TFC more profitable?
- TFC runs the higher net margin — MET at 4.70% versus TFC at 18.14%.
- Which has been the better investment, MET or TFC?
- Over the past 10-year, MET delivered the higher annualized total return — MET at 12.46% versus TFC at 7.99%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
MetLife P/E ratioTruist Financial P/E ratioMetLife dividend yieldTruist Financial dividend yieldMetLife ROETruist Financial ROEMetLife operating marginTruist Financial operating marginMetLife revenue growthTruist Financial revenue growthMetLife free cash flowTruist Financial free cash flow
MetLife & Truist Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.