Mastercard Incorporated (MA) vs VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN)
MA leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Mastercard Incorporated and VeriSign, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$489.98Financial Services
VRSN
VeriSign, Inc.
$279.89Technology
Total return — MA vs VRSN
growth of $100 · last 20yMA +10551.7%VRSN +1159.1%MA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MA VRSN
MA vs VRSN: by the numbers
- •MA is the larger company ($432.94B vs $25.47B market cap).
- •MA trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.36 vs 30.93 P/E).
- •VRSN converts more revenue to profit (49.96% vs 45.88% net margin).
- •MA grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.05% vs 5.69% CAGR).
- •VRSN pays the higher dividend yield (1.13% vs 0.67%).
Which is better, MA or VRSN?
Metric tally: MA 11 · VRSN 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMA(lower P/E)
GrowthMA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeVRSN(higher dividend yield)
QualityMA(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MA | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.36● | 30.93 |
| Forward P/E | 21.48● | 28.46 |
| P/S ratio | 12.89● | 15.26 |
| P/B ratio | 65.09 | — |
| PEG ratio | 1.81● | 2.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.13● | 22.63 |
| FCF yield | 4.05% | 4.08% |
Profitability
| Metric | MA | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.96% | 88.35%● |
| Operating margin | 59.40% | 67.93%● |
| Net margin | 45.88% | 49.96%● |
| ROE | 231.63%● | -38.33% |
| ROIC | 48.63%● | -61876.44% |
Dividends
| Metric | MA | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.67% | 1.13%● |
| Payout ratio | 19.70% | 35.79% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MA | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.05%● | 5.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 20.93%● | 4.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 23.43%● | 8.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.65%● | 5.15% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MA or VRSN?
- It depends on your goal. value: MA (lower P/E); growth: MA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: VRSN (higher dividend yield); quality: MA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MA leads 11 to 4.
- Is MA or VRSN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MA is cheaper: MA trades at a 28.36 P/E and VRSN at 30.93.
- Which has grown faster, MA or VRSN?
- Over the past five years, MA grew revenue faster — MA at a 17.05% CAGR versus VRSN at 5.69%.
- Does MA or VRSN pay a bigger dividend?
- MA yields 0.67% and VRSN yields 1.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MA or VRSN more profitable?
- VRSN runs the higher net margin — MA at 45.88% versus VRSN at 49.96%.
- Which has been the better investment, MA or VRSN?
- Over the past 10-year, MA delivered the higher annualized total return — MA at 18.49% versus VRSN at 12.87%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Mastercard P/E ratioVeriSign P/E ratioMastercard dividend yieldVeriSign dividend yieldMastercard ROEVeriSign ROEMastercard operating marginVeriSign operating marginMastercard revenue growthVeriSign revenue growthMastercard free cash flowVeriSign free cash flow
Mastercard & VeriSign appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.