Which has grown faster, LULU or W?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus W at -3.71%.

Is LULU or W more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus W at -2.41%.

Which has been the better investment, LULU or W?

Over the past 10-year, W delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.35% versus W at 7.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) vs Wayfair Inc. (W)

LULU leads on 11 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Wayfair Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.49B

$118.77Consumer Cyclical

Wayfair Inc.

$10.24B

$77.59Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LULU vs W

growth of $100 · last 12y

LULU +180.4%W +105.7%LULU compounded faster

LULU W

LULU vs W: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.49B vs $10.24B market cap).
•LULU is profitable (13.03% net margin) while W runs a net loss (-2.41%).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs -3.71% CAGR).

Which is better, LULU or W?

Metric tally: LULU 11 · W 1

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LULU	W
P/E ratio	9.62	—
Forward P/E	10.71●	21.20
P/S ratio	1.22	0.80●
P/B ratio	2.84	—
PEG ratio	0.40	—
EV / EBITDA	5.81●	99.96
FCF yield	9.33%●	4.49%

Profitability

Metric	LULU	W
Gross margin	55.70%●	30.08%
Operating margin	18.21%●	1.08%
Net margin	13.03%●	-2.41%
ROE	30.25%●	11.25%
ROIC	22.70%●	1.30%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LULU	W
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.61%●	-3.71%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.02%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.36%●	-21.69%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.88%●	-24.82%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LULU or W?: It depends on your goal. growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 11 to 1.
Which has grown faster, LULU or W?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — LULU at a 17.61% CAGR versus W at -3.71%.
Is LULU or W more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — LULU at 13.03% versus W at -2.41%.
Which has been the better investment, LULU or W?: Over the past 10-year, W delivered the higher annualized total return — LULU at 5.35% versus W at 7.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LULU analysis Full W analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Wayfair P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Wayfair dividend yield Lululemon Athletica ROE Wayfair ROE Lululemon Athletica operating margin Wayfair operating margin Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Wayfair revenue growth Lululemon Athletica free cash flow Wayfair free cash flow

Lululemon Athletica & Wayfair appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.