Which has grown faster, LU or T?

Over the past five years, T grew revenue faster — LU at a -6.44% CAGR versus T at -6.06%.

Does LU or T pay a bigger dividend?

T pays a dividend (4.71% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Is LU or T more profitable?

T runs the higher net margin — LU at -10.59% versus T at 16.89%.

Which has been the better investment, LU or T?

Over the past 5-year, T delivered the higher annualized total return — LU at -40.92% versus T at 4.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) vs AT&T Inc. (T)

T leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lufax Holding Ltd and AT&T Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Lufax Holding Ltd

$558M

$1.33Financial Services

AT&T Inc.

$163.84B

$23.58Communication Services

Total return — LU vs T

growth of $100 · last 6y

LU -97.4%T +15.6%T compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LU T

LU vs T: by the numbers

•T is the larger company ($163.84B vs $558M market cap).
•T is profitable (16.89% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-10.59%).
•T grew revenue faster over the past five years (-6.06% vs -6.44% CAGR).
•T pays a dividend (4.71% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LU or T?

Metric tally: LU 4 · T 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LU	T
P/E ratio	—	7.94
Forward P/E	—	9.28
P/S ratio	0.09●	1.31
P/B ratio	0.05●	1.51
PEG ratio	—	0.08
EV / EBITDA	72.98	5.88●
FCF yield	312.50%●	10.47%

Profitability

Metric	LU	T
Gross margin	41.96%	79.66%●
Operating margin	-4.31%	19.35%●
Net margin	-10.59%	16.89%●
ROE	-4.14%	19.48%●
ROIC	-0.21%	5.57%●

Dividends

Metric	LU	T
Dividend yield	—	4.71%
Payout ratio	—	36.51%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LU	T
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-6.44%	-6.06%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-43.16%	8.15%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	24.09%●	-10.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-40.92%	7.79%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LU or T?: It depends on your goal. growth: T (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: T (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, T leads 9 to 4.
Which has grown faster, LU or T?: Over the past five years, T grew revenue faster — LU at a -6.44% CAGR versus T at -6.06%.
Does LU or T pay a bigger dividend?: T pays a dividend (4.71% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.
Is LU or T more profitable?: T runs the higher net margin — LU at -10.59% versus T at 16.89%.
Which has been the better investment, LU or T?: Over the past 5-year, T delivered the higher annualized total return — LU at -40.92% versus T at 4.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LU analysis Full T analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lufax P/E ratio AT&T P/E ratio Lufax dividend yield AT&T dividend yield Lufax ROE AT&T ROE Lufax operating margin AT&T operating margin Lufax revenue growth AT&T revenue growth Lufax free cash flow AT&T free cash flow

Lufax & AT&T appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.