Is LRCX or NVDA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: LRCX trades at a 69.21 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.

Which has grown faster, LRCX or NVDA?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 10.31% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.

Does LRCX or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?

LRCX yields 0.28% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LRCX or NVDA more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 30.94% versus NVDA at 62.97%.

Which has been the better investment, LRCX or NVDA?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — LRCX at 48.10% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

NVDA leads on 15 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lam Research Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LRCX

Lam Research Corporation

Total return — LRCX vs NVDA

growth of $100 · last 27y

LRCX +41821.6%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LRCX NVDA

LRCX vs NVDA: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $458.72B market cap).
•NVDA trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.42 vs 69.21 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 30.94% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 10.31% CAGR).
•LRCX pays the higher dividend yield (0.28% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, LRCX or NVDA?

Metric tally: LRCX 2 · NVDA 15

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNVDA(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LRCX	NVDA
P/E ratio	69.21	31.42●
Forward P/E	45.79	16.44●
P/S ratio	21.27	19.74●
P/B ratio	43.57	25.60●
PEG ratio	0.54●	0.57
EV / EBITDA	57.60	25.96●
FCF yield	1.40%	2.38%●

Profitability

Metric	LRCX	NVDA
Gross margin	49.98%	74.15%●
Operating margin	34.26%	64.02%●
Net margin	30.94%	62.97%●
ROE	63.38%	81.65%●
ROIC	34.00%	62.88%●

Dividends

Metric	LRCX	NVDA
Dividend yield	0.28%●	0.01%
Payout ratio	24.22%	0.61%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LRCX	NVDA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.31%	68.23%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.72%	85.78%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.28%	85.52%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	43.19%	63.05%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LRCX or NVDA?: It depends on your goal. value: NVDA (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 15 to 2.
Is LRCX or NVDA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: LRCX trades at a 69.21 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
Which has grown faster, LRCX or NVDA?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 10.31% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
Does LRCX or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?: LRCX yields 0.28% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LRCX or NVDA more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 30.94% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
Which has been the better investment, LRCX or NVDA?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — LRCX at 48.10% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.