Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
A side-by-side comparison of Lam Research Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
$298.22TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$218.29TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LRCX vs NVDA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yLRCX +3536.3% (+43.2%/yr)NVDA +14538.6% (+64.6%/yr)NVDA compounded faster over this window
LRCX NVDA
LRCX vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($5.29T vs $372.94B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.60 vs 51.77 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (63.66% vs 31.27% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.34% vs 11.25% CAGR).
- •LRCX pays the higher dividend yield (0.35% vs 0.13%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LRCX | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 51.77 | 27.60 |
| Forward P/E | 31.43 | 23.59 |
| P/S ratio | 16.05 | 17.45 |
| P/B ratio | 29.91 | 23.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.99 | 26.35 |
| FCF yield | 1.21% | 2.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | LRCX | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.47% | 74.67% |
| Operating margin | 35.29% | 65.21% |
| Net margin | 31.27% | 63.66% |
| ROE | 58.26% | 84.23% |
| ROIC | 40.77% | 59.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | LRCX | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.13% |
| Payout ratio | 18.06% | 3.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LRCX | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.25% | 69.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.30% | 94.31% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 12.22% | 82.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 39.31% | 57.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LRCX or NVDA?
- NVDA has the lower trailing P/E: LRCX trades at 51.77 and NVDA at 27.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LRCX or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 11.25% CAGR versus NVDA at 69.34%.
- Does LRCX or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- LRCX yields 0.35% and NVDA yields 0.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LRCX or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 31.27% versus NVDA at 63.66%.
- How have LRCX and NVDA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, LRCX delivered 43.62% and NVDA delivered 64.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lam Research P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioLam Research dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldLam Research ROENVIDIA ROELam Research operating marginNVIDIA operating marginLam Research revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthLam Research free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Lam Research & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.