Which has the lower trailing P/E, L or WRB?

L has the lower trailing P/E: L trades at 15.15 and WRB at 15.53. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, L or WRB?

Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus WRB at 15.38%.

Does L or WRB pay a bigger dividend?

L yields 0.21% and WRB yields 2.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is L or WRB more profitable?

WRB runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus WRB at 10.71%.

How have L and WRB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, L delivered 11.64% and WRB delivered 18.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Loews Corporation (L) vs W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)

A side-by-side comparison of Loews Corporation and W. R. Berkley Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Loews Corporation

$24.47B

$118.94Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WRB

W. R. Berkley Corporation

$28.16B

$75.65Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — L vs WRB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

L +1006.3%WRB +6976.2%WRB compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

L WRB

L vs WRB: by the numbers

•WRB is the larger company ($28.16B vs $24.47B market cap).
•L trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.15 vs 15.53 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WRB converts more revenue to profit (10.71% vs 10.22% net margin).
•WRB grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.38% vs 5.43% CAGR).
•WRB pays the higher dividend yield (2.47% vs 0.21%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	L	WRB
P/E ratio	15.15	15.53
Forward P/E	N/A	15.66
P/S ratio	1.34	1.65
P/B ratio	1.31	2.90
PEG ratio	0.55	7.63

Profitability

Metric	L	WRB
Gross margin	46.05%	19.81%
Operating margin	12.62%	13.69%
Net margin	10.22%	10.71%
ROE	9.99%	18.89%
ROIC	3.76%	10.42%

Dividends

Metric	L	WRB
Dividend yield	0.21%	2.47%
Payout ratio	3.14%	41.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	L	WRB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.43%	15.38%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.17%	28.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	17.58%	20.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, L or WRB?: L has the lower trailing P/E: L trades at 15.15 and WRB at 15.53. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, L or WRB?: Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus WRB at 15.38%.
Does L or WRB pay a bigger dividend?: L yields 0.21% and WRB yields 2.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is L or WRB more profitable?: WRB runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus WRB at 10.71%.
How have L and WRB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, L delivered 11.64% and WRB delivered 18.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full L analysis Full WRB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Loews P/E ratio W. R. Berkley P/E ratio Loews dividend yield W. R. Berkley dividend yield Loews ROE W. R. Berkley ROE Loews operating margin W. R. Berkley operating margin Loews revenue growth W. R. Berkley revenue growth Loews free cash flow W. R. Berkley free cash flow

Loews & W. R. Berkley appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.