Loews Corporation (L) vs W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)
WRB leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics, though L is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Loews Corporation and W. R. Berkley Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
L
Loews Corporation
$108.12Financial Services
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
$68.27Financial Services
Total return — L vs WRB
growth of $100 · last 30yL +733.0%WRB +4012.7%WRB compounded faster
L WRB
L vs WRB: by the numbers
- •WRB is the larger company ($25.42B vs $22.25B market cap).
- •L trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.77 vs 14.46 P/E).
- •WRB converts more revenue to profit (12.64% vs 10.22% net margin).
- •WRB grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.95% vs 5.43% CAGR).
- •WRB pays the higher dividend yield (2.72% vs 0.23%).
Which is better, L or WRB?
Metric tally: L 5 · WRB 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueL(lower P/E)
GrowthWRB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWRB(higher dividend yield)
QualityWRB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | L | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.77● | 14.46 |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.58 |
| P/S ratio | 1.22● | 1.82 |
| P/B ratio | 1.19● | 2.77 |
| PEG ratio | 0.55● | 7.63 |
Profitability
| Metric | L | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.05%● | 26.14% |
| Operating margin | 12.62% | 16.24%● |
| Net margin | 10.22% | 12.64%● |
| ROE | 9.99% | 19.27%● |
| ROIC | 3.76% | 10.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | L | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 2.72%● |
| Payout ratio | 3.14% | 41.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | L | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.43% | 11.95%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.17% | 28.88%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.35% | 17.46%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, L or WRB?
- It depends on your goal. value: L (lower P/E); growth: WRB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WRB (higher dividend yield); quality: WRB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WRB leads 8 to 5.
- Is L or WRB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, L is cheaper: L trades at a 13.77 P/E and WRB at 14.46.
- Which has grown faster, L or WRB?
- Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus WRB at 11.95%.
- Does L or WRB pay a bigger dividend?
- L yields 0.23% and WRB yields 2.72% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is L or WRB more profitable?
- WRB runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus WRB at 12.64%.
- Which has been the better investment, L or WRB?
- Over the past 10-year, WRB delivered the higher annualized total return — L at 11.00% versus WRB at 17.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Loews P/E ratioW. R. Berkley P/E ratioLoews dividend yieldW. R. Berkley dividend yieldLoews ROEW. R. Berkley ROELoews operating marginW. R. Berkley operating marginLoews revenue growthW. R. Berkley revenue growthLoews free cash flowW. R. Berkley free cash flow
Loews & W. R. Berkley appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.