KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
NVDA leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of KLA Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — KLAC vs NVDA
growth of $100 · last 27yKLAC +9843.0%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
KLAC NVDA
KLAC vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $332.50B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.42 vs 72.05 P/E).
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 35.66% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 15.21% CAGR).
- •KLAC pays the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 0.01%).
Which is better, KLAC or NVDA?
Metric tally: KLAC 3 · NVDA 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNVDA(lower P/E)
GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKLAC(higher dividend yield)
QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KLAC | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 72.05 | 31.42● |
| Forward P/E | 50.02 | 16.44● |
| P/S ratio | 25.61 | 19.74● |
| P/B ratio | 57.52 | 25.60● |
| PEG ratio | 0.06● | 0.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 57.56 | 25.96● |
| FCF yield | 1.20% | 2.38%● |
Profitability
| Metric | KLAC | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.75% | 74.15%● |
| Operating margin | 42.08% | 64.02%● |
| Net margin | 35.66% | 62.97%● |
| ROE | 80.11% | 81.65% |
| ROIC | 38.11% | 62.88%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KLAC | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.14%● | 0.01% |
| Payout ratio | 262.04% | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KLAC | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.21% | 68.23%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 31.52% | 85.78%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.49% | 85.52%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 67.17%● | 63.05% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KLAC or NVDA?
- It depends on your goal. value: NVDA (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KLAC (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 13 to 3.
- Is KLAC or NVDA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: KLAC trades at a 72.05 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
- Which has grown faster, KLAC or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 15.21% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does KLAC or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- KLAC yields 3.14% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KLAC or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.66% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- Which has been the better investment, KLAC or NVDA?
- Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — KLAC at 67.44% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
KLA P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioKLA dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldKLA ROENVIDIA ROEKLA operating marginNVIDIA operating marginKLA revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthKLA free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
KLA & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.