Is JBL or ROP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: JBL trades at a 44.77 P/E and ROP at 21.13.

Which has grown faster, JBL or ROP?

Over the past five years, ROP grew revenue faster — JBL at a 2.86% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.

Does JBL or ROP pay a bigger dividend?

JBL yields 0.09% and ROP yields 1.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is JBL or ROP more profitable?

ROP runs the higher net margin — JBL at 2.57% versus ROP at 21.12%.

Which has been the better investment, JBL or ROP?

Over the past 10-year, JBL delivered the higher annualized total return — JBL at 35.42% versus ROP at 7.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Jabil Inc. (JBL) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)

ROP leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Jabil Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Roper Technologies, Inc.

$34.14B

$338.31Technology

Total return — JBL vs ROP

growth of $100 · last 30y

JBL +23806.7%ROP +2675.3%JBL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

JBL ROP

JBL vs ROP: by the numbers

•JBL is the larger company ($37.79B vs $34.14B market cap).
•ROP trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.13 vs 44.77 P/E).
•ROP converts more revenue to profit (21.12% vs 2.57% net margin).
•ROP grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.25% vs 2.86% CAGR).
•ROP pays the higher dividend yield (1.08% vs 0.09%).

Which is better, JBL or ROP?

Metric tally: JBL 7 · ROP 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueROP(lower P/E)

GrowthROP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeROP(higher dividend yield)

QualityJBL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	JBL	ROP
P/E ratio	44.77	21.13●
Forward P/E	28.11	15.45●
P/S ratio	1.14●	4.36
P/B ratio	28.87	1.88●
PEG ratio	0.59●	2.22
EV / EBITDA	20.85	13.38●
FCF yield	3.94%	7.21%●

Profitability

Metric	JBL	ROP
Gross margin	9.23%	69.40%●
Operating margin	4.32%	28.09%●
Net margin	2.57%	21.12%●
ROE	65.15%●	9.11%
ROIC	16.06%●	5.62%

Dividends

Metric	JBL	ROP
Dividend yield	0.09%	1.08%●
Payout ratio	5.33%	25.44%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	JBL	ROP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.86%	9.25%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	75.55%●	9.53%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	59.60%●	8.90%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	44.67%●	-5.63%

Frequently asked

Which is better, JBL or ROP?: It depends on your goal. value: ROP (lower P/E); growth: ROP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ROP (higher dividend yield); quality: JBL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ROP leads 10 to 7.
Is JBL or ROP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: JBL trades at a 44.77 P/E and ROP at 21.13.
Which has grown faster, JBL or ROP?: Over the past five years, ROP grew revenue faster — JBL at a 2.86% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.
Does JBL or ROP pay a bigger dividend?: JBL yields 0.09% and ROP yields 1.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is JBL or ROP more profitable?: ROP runs the higher net margin — JBL at 2.57% versus ROP at 21.12%.
Which has been the better investment, JBL or ROP?: Over the past 10-year, JBL delivered the higher annualized total return — JBL at 35.42% versus ROP at 7.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full JBL analysis Full ROP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Jabil P/E ratio Roper Technologies P/E ratio Jabil dividend yield Roper Technologies dividend yield Jabil ROE Roper Technologies ROE Jabil operating margin Roper Technologies operating margin Jabil revenue growth Roper Technologies revenue growth Jabil free cash flow Roper Technologies free cash flow

Jabil & Roper Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.