Jabil Inc. (JBL) vs Everpure, Inc. (P)
A side-by-side comparison of Jabil Inc. and Everpure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 25, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
JBL
Jabil Inc.
$308.68TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
P
Everpure, Inc.
$102.78TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — JBL vs P
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yJBL +1446.2% (+31.5%/yr)P +781.4% (+24.3%/yr)JBL compounded faster over this window
JBL P
JBL vs P: by the numbers
- •P is the larger company ($34.16B vs $32.35B market cap).
- •JBL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (38.06 vs 152.24 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •P converts more revenue to profit (5.75% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •P grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs 2.86% CAGR).
- •JBL pays a dividend (0.10% yield), while P has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | JBL | P |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 38.06 | 152.24 |
| Forward P/E | 23.90 | 51.64 |
| P/S ratio | 0.97 | 8.33 |
| P/B ratio | 24.54 | 22.75 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.29 | 100.58 |
| FCF yield | 4.63% | 1.57% |
Profitability
| Metric | JBL | P |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 9.23% | 70.23% |
| Operating margin | 4.32% | 4.21% |
| Net margin | 2.57% | 5.75% |
| ROE | 65.15% | 15.69% |
| ROIC | 18.48% | 5.09% |
Dividends
| Metric | JBL | P |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 5.33% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | JBL | P |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.86% | 17.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.55% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 59.60% | 47.05% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 38.89% | 37.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, JBL or P?
- JBL has the lower trailing P/E: JBL trades at 38.06 and P at 152.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, JBL or P?
- Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — JBL at a 2.86% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.
- Does JBL or P pay a bigger dividend?
- JBL pays a dividend (0.10% yield), while P has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is JBL or P more profitable?
- P runs the higher net margin — JBL at 2.57% versus P at 5.75%.
- How have JBL and P total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, JBL delivered 31.60% and P delivered 24.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Jabil P/E ratioEverpure P/E ratioJabil dividend yieldJabil ROEEverpure ROEJabil operating marginEverpure operating marginJabil revenue growthEverpure revenue growthJabil free cash flowEverpure free cash flow
Jabil & Everpure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 25, 2026.