Is JBL or NTAP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NTAP is cheaper: JBL trades at a 42.22 P/E and NTAP at 25.72.

Which has grown faster, JBL or NTAP?

Over the past five years, NTAP grew revenue faster — JBL at a 2.86% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.

Does JBL or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?

JBL yields 0.09% and NTAP yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is JBL or NTAP more profitable?

NTAP runs the higher net margin — JBL at 2.57% versus NTAP at 18.43%.

Which has been the better investment, JBL or NTAP?

Over the past 10-year, JBL delivered the higher annualized total return — JBL at 34.17% versus NTAP at 24.43%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Jabil Inc. (JBL) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)

NTAP leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Jabil Inc. and NetApp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 7, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — JBL vs NTAP

growth of $100 · last 30y

JBL +23387.5%NTAP +8935.9%JBL compounded faster

JBL NTAP

JBL vs NTAP: by the numbers

•JBL is the larger company ($33.30B vs $32.57B market cap).
•NTAP trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.72 vs 42.22 P/E).
•NTAP converts more revenue to profit (18.43% vs 2.57% net margin).
•NTAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.18% vs 2.86% CAGR).
•NTAP pays the higher dividend yield (1.27% vs 0.09%).

Which is better, JBL or NTAP?

Metric tally: JBL 5 · NTAP 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNTAP(lower P/E)

GrowthNTAP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeNTAP(higher dividend yield)

QualityNTAP(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	JBL	NTAP
P/E ratio	42.22	25.72●
Forward P/E	26.51	20.49●
P/S ratio	1.07●	4.70
P/B ratio	27.23	24.09●
PEG ratio	0.56●	1.58
EV / EBITDA	19.74	17.76●
FCF yield	4.18%	5.74%●

Profitability

Metric	JBL	NTAP
Gross margin	9.23%	70.74%●
Operating margin	4.32%	24.12%●
Net margin	2.57%	18.43%●
ROE	65.15%	94.45%●
ROIC	16.06%	19.40%●

Dividends

Metric	JBL	NTAP
Dividend yield	0.09%	1.27%●
Payout ratio	5.33%	32.35%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	JBL	NTAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.86%	4.18%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	75.55%●	10.39%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	59.60%●	12.50%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	41.45%●	17.56%

Frequently asked

Which is better, JBL or NTAP?: It depends on your goal. value: NTAP (lower P/E); growth: NTAP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTAP (higher dividend yield); quality: NTAP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTAP leads 12 to 5.
Is JBL or NTAP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NTAP is cheaper: JBL trades at a 42.22 P/E and NTAP at 25.72.
Which has grown faster, JBL or NTAP?: Over the past five years, NTAP grew revenue faster — JBL at a 2.86% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.
Does JBL or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?: JBL yields 0.09% and NTAP yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is JBL or NTAP more profitable?: NTAP runs the higher net margin — JBL at 2.57% versus NTAP at 18.43%.
Which has been the better investment, JBL or NTAP?: Over the past 10-year, JBL delivered the higher annualized total return — JBL at 34.17% versus NTAP at 24.43%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full JBL analysis Full NTAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Jabil P/E ratio NetApp P/E ratio Jabil dividend yield NetApp dividend yield Jabil ROE NetApp ROE Jabil operating margin NetApp operating margin Jabil revenue growth NetApp revenue growth Jabil free cash flow NetApp free cash flow

Jabil & NetApp appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 7, 2026.