Which has the lower trailing P/E, JBL or NTAP?

NTAP has the lower trailing P/E: JBL trades at 39.10 and NTAP at 30.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, JBL or NTAP?

Over the past five years, NTAP grew revenue faster — JBL at a 2.86% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.

Does JBL or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?

JBL yields 0.10% and NTAP yields 1.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is JBL or NTAP more profitable?

NTAP runs the higher net margin — JBL at 2.57% versus NTAP at 18.43%.

How have JBL and NTAP total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, JBL delivered 31.84% and NTAP delivered 21.61% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Jabil Inc. (JBL) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)

A side-by-side comparison of Jabil Inc. and NetApp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

JBL

Jabil Inc.

$32.82B

$313.21TechnologyAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

$37.73B

$192.27TechnologyAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — JBL vs NTAP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

JBL +1488.4% (+31.9%/yr)NTAP +602.6% (+21.5%/yr)JBL compounded faster over this window

JBL NTAP

JBL vs NTAP: by the numbers

•NTAP is the larger company ($37.73B vs $32.82B market cap).
•NTAP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.23 vs 39.10 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NTAP converts more revenue to profit (18.43% vs 2.57% net margin).
•NTAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.18% vs 2.86% CAGR).
•NTAP pays the higher dividend yield (1.08% vs 0.10%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	JBL	NTAP
P/E ratio	39.10	30.23
Forward P/E	24.55	24.09
P/S ratio	0.99	5.53
P/B ratio	25.21	28.32
EV / EBITDA	16.70	20.82
FCF yield	4.51%	4.89%

Profitability

Metric	JBL	NTAP
Gross margin	9.23%	70.74%
Operating margin	4.32%	24.12%
Net margin	2.57%	18.43%
ROE	65.15%	94.45%
ROIC	18.48%	19.23%

Dividends

Metric	JBL	NTAP
Dividend yield	0.10%	1.08%
Payout ratio	5.33%	32.35%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	JBL	NTAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.86%	4.18%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	75.55%	14.39%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	59.60%	12.50%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	39.76%	21.70%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, JBL or NTAP?: NTAP has the lower trailing P/E: JBL trades at 39.10 and NTAP at 30.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, JBL or NTAP?: Over the past five years, NTAP grew revenue faster — JBL at a 2.86% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.
Does JBL or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?: JBL yields 0.10% and NTAP yields 1.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is JBL or NTAP more profitable?: NTAP runs the higher net margin — JBL at 2.57% versus NTAP at 18.43%.
How have JBL and NTAP total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, JBL delivered 31.84% and NTAP delivered 21.61% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full JBL analysis Full NTAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Jabil P/E ratio NetApp P/E ratio Jabil dividend yield NetApp dividend yield Jabil ROE NetApp ROE Jabil operating margin NetApp operating margin Jabil revenue growth NetApp revenue growth Jabil free cash flow NetApp free cash flow

Jabil & NetApp appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.