Which has the lower trailing P/E, IR or UAL?

UAL has the lower trailing P/E: IR trades at 29.46 and UAL at 9.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, IR or UAL?

Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — IR at a 9.56% CAGR versus UAL at 33.94%.

Does IR or UAL pay a bigger dividend?

IR pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while UAL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is IR or UAL more profitable?

IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 12.08% versus UAL at 5.56%.

How have IR and UAL total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, IR delivered 6.03% and UAL delivered 18.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL)

A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Ingersoll Rand Inc.

$28.01B

$71.59IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT

UAL

United Airlines Holdings, Inc.

$34.54B

$106.42IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT

Total return — IR vs UAL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

IR +335.6% (+17.8%/yr)UAL +42.9% (+4.0%/yr)IR compounded faster over this window

IR UAL

IR vs UAL: by the numbers

•UAL is the larger company ($34.54B vs $28.01B market cap).
•UAL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.96 vs 29.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•IR converts more revenue to profit (12.08% vs 5.56% net margin).
•UAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.94% vs 9.56% CAGR).
•IR pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while UAL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	IR	UAL
P/E ratio	29.46	9.96
Forward P/E	20.20	10.59
P/S ratio	3.53	0.55
P/B ratio	2.75	2.07
EV / EBITDA	14.31	7.38
FCF yield	4.35%	7.37%

Profitability

Metric	IR	UAL
Gross margin	37.94%	65.06%
Operating margin	21.52%	7.75%
Net margin	12.08%	5.56%
ROE	9.42%	20.94%
ROIC	8.36%	6.46%

Dividends

Metric	IR	UAL
Dividend yield	0.11%	N/A
Payout ratio	3.29%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	IR	UAL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.56%	33.94%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.01%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.43%	52.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.03%	18.13%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, IR or UAL?: UAL has the lower trailing P/E: IR trades at 29.46 and UAL at 9.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, IR or UAL?: Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — IR at a 9.56% CAGR versus UAL at 33.94%.
Does IR or UAL pay a bigger dividend?: IR pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while UAL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is IR or UAL more profitable?: IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 12.08% versus UAL at 5.56%.
How have IR and UAL total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, IR delivered 6.03% and UAL delivered 18.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full IR analysis Full UAL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ingersoll R P/E ratio United Airlines P/E ratio Ingersoll R dividend yield Ingersoll R ROE United Airlines ROE Ingersoll R operating margin United Airlines operating margin Ingersoll R revenue growth United Airlines revenue growth Ingersoll R free cash flow United Airlines free cash flow

Ingersoll R & United Airlines appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.