Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL)
UAL leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ingersoll Rand Inc. and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$80.19IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$117.52IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — IR vs UAL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9yIR +375.0%UAL +55.6%IR compounded faster
IR UAL
IR vs UAL: by the numbers
- •UAL is the larger company ($38.14B vs $31.38B market cap).
- •UAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.80 vs 55.57 P/E).
- •IR converts more revenue to profit (7.54% vs 5.56% net margin).
- •UAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.94% vs 10.25% CAGR).
- •IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, IR or UAL?
Metric tally: IR 2 · UAL 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUAL(lower P/E)
GrowthUAL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityUAL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | IR | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 55.57 | 10.80● |
| Forward P/E | 23.45 | 11.09● |
| P/S ratio | 4.14 | 0.60● |
| P/B ratio | 3.17 | 2.26● |
| PEG ratio | 5.05 | 1.67● |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.87 | 7.78● |
| FCF yield | 3.60% | 10.31%● |
Profitability
| Metric | IR | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.24% | 65.06%● |
| Operating margin | 18.06%● | 7.75% |
| Net margin | 7.54%● | 5.56% |
| ROE | 5.77% | 20.94%● |
| ROIC | 6.34% | 6.63%● |
Dividends
| Metric | IR | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | — |
| Payout ratio | 5.48% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | IR | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.25% | 33.94%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.01% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.93% | 63.66%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.88% | 20.30%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, IR or UAL?
- It depends on your goal. value: UAL (lower P/E); growth: UAL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: UAL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UAL leads 13 to 2.
- Is IR or UAL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UAL is cheaper: IR trades at a 55.57 P/E and UAL at 10.80.
- Which has grown faster, IR or UAL?
- Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — IR at a 10.25% CAGR versus UAL at 33.94%.
- Does IR or UAL pay a bigger dividend?
- IR pays a dividend (0.10% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
- Is IR or UAL more profitable?
- IR runs the higher net margin — IR at 7.54% versus UAL at 5.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, IR or UAL?
- Over the past 5-year, IR delivered the higher annualized total return — IR at 10.88% versus UAL at 9.22%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ingersoll Rand P/E ratioUnited Airlines P/E ratioIngersoll Rand dividend yieldUnited Airlines dividend yieldIngersoll Rand ROEUnited Airlines ROEIngersoll Rand operating marginUnited Airlines operating marginIngersoll Rand revenue growthUnited Airlines revenue growthIngersoll Rand free cash flowUnited Airlines free cash flow
Ingersoll Rand & United Airlines appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.