Humana Inc. (HUM) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)
A side-by-side comparison of Humana Inc. and Microsoft Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: HUM is classified in Healthcare; MSFT is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
HUM
Humana Inc.
$388.71HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$393.35TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — HUM vs MSFT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yHUM +2547.6%MSFT +7530.9%MSFT compounded faster
HUM MSFT
HUM vs MSFT: by the numbers
- •MSFT is the larger company ($2.92T vs $46.67B market cap).
- •MSFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.16 vs 40.76 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MSFT converts more revenue to profit (39.34% vs 0.82% net margin).
- •MSFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.75% vs 11.71% CAGR).
- •MSFT pays the higher dividend yield (0.91% vs 0.70%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HUM | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.76 | 23.16 |
| Forward P/E | 42.42 | 22.87 |
| P/S ratio | 0.34 | 9.10 |
| P/B ratio | 2.48 | 6.99 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.16 | 15.53 |
| FCF yield | 2.77% | 2.52% |
Profitability
| Metric | HUM | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 14.01% | 68.31% |
| Operating margin | 1.01% | 46.80% |
| Net margin | 0.82% | 39.34% |
| ROE | 6.08% | 30.22% |
| ROIC | 3.12% | 21.63% |
Dividends
| Metric | HUM | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 0.91% |
| Payout ratio | 26.90% | 25.99% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HUM | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.71% | 14.75% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.27% | 18.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -17.19% | 6.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.91% | 7.19% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUM or MSFT?
- MSFT has the lower trailing P/E: HUM trades at 40.76 and MSFT at 23.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, HUM or MSFT?
- Over the past five years, MSFT grew revenue faster — HUM at a 11.71% CAGR versus MSFT at 14.75%.
- Does HUM or MSFT pay a bigger dividend?
- HUM yields 0.70% and MSFT yields 0.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is HUM or MSFT more profitable?
- MSFT runs the higher net margin — HUM at 0.82% versus MSFT at 39.34%.
- How have HUM and MSFT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, HUM delivered 9.18% and MSFT delivered 22.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Humana P/E ratioMicrosoft P/E ratioHumana dividend yieldMicrosoft dividend yieldHumana ROEMicrosoft ROEHumana operating marginMicrosoft operating marginHumana revenue growthMicrosoft revenue growthHumana free cash flowMicrosoft free cash flow
Humana & Microsoft appear in these rankings
Highest ROE StocksHighest ROIC StocksHighest Operating Margin StocksHighest 10-Year Total Return Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.