Is HUBS or SIMO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: HUBS trades at a 98.51 P/E and SIMO at 21.85.

Which has grown faster, HUBS or SIMO?

Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 27.85% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.

Does HUBS or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while HUBS does not currently pay one.

Is HUBS or SIMO more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 3.04% versus SIMO at 16.02%.

Which has been the better investment, HUBS or SIMO?

Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — HUBS at 14.37% versus SIMO at 23.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

SIMO leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of HubSpot, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$9.41B

$280.49Technology

Total return — HUBS vs SIMO

growth of $100 · last 12y

HUBS +547.1%SIMO +1088.0%SIMO compounded faster

HUBS SIMO

HUBS vs SIMO: by the numbers

•HUBS is the larger company ($9.63B vs $9.41B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.85 vs 98.51 P/E).
•SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 3.04% net margin).
•HUBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.85% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while HUBS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, HUBS or SIMO?

Metric tally: HUBS 4 · SIMO 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSIMO(lower P/E)

GrowthHUBS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	HUBS	SIMO
P/E ratio	98.51	21.85●
Forward P/E	—	32.07
P/S ratio	3.00	2.66●
P/B ratio	4.95	2.84●
PEG ratio	0.52	0.17●
EV / EBITDA	35.09	12.65●
FCF yield	7.21%●	0.27%

Profitability

Metric	HUBS	SIMO
Gross margin	83.65%●	48.09%
Operating margin	1.95%	12.77%●
Net margin	3.04%	16.02%●
ROE	5.02%	18.76%●
ROIC	0.31%	9.22%●

Dividends

Metric	HUBS	SIMO
Dividend yield	—	0.71%
Payout ratio	—	13.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUBS	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	27.85%●	12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	57.18%●	-42.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.40%	37.00%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, HUBS or SIMO?: It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: HUBS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 10 to 4.
Is HUBS or SIMO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: HUBS trades at a 98.51 P/E and SIMO at 21.85.
Which has grown faster, HUBS or SIMO?: Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 27.85% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
Does HUBS or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while HUBS does not currently pay one.
Is HUBS or SIMO more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 3.04% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
Which has been the better investment, HUBS or SIMO?: Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — HUBS at 14.37% versus SIMO at 23.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUBS analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HubSpot P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio HubSpot dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield HubSpot ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE HubSpot operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin HubSpot revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth HubSpot free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

HubSpot & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.