Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or SIMO?

SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 69.81 and SIMO at 8.13. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUBS or SIMO?

Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 26.31% CAGR versus SIMO at 14.30%.

Does HUBS or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while HUBS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HUBS or SIMO more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 4.26% versus SIMO at 22.06%.

How have HUBS and SIMO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 15.40% and SIMO delivered 21.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

A side-by-side comparison of HubSpot, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HUBS

HubSpot, Inc.

$10.12B

$197.57TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 29, 2026, 12:15 PM EDT

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$9.32B

$277.66TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 29, 2026, 12:15 PM EDT

Total return — HUBS vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HUBS +319.2% (+15.4%/yr)SIMO +604.7% (+21.6%/yr)SIMO compounded faster over this window

HUBS SIMO

HUBS vs SIMO: by the numbers

•HUBS is the larger company ($10.12B vs $9.32B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.13 vs 69.81 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SIMO converts more revenue to profit (22.06% vs 4.26% net margin).
•HUBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.31% vs 14.30% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while HUBS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUBS	SIMO
P/E ratio	69.81	8.13
Forward P/E	N/A	24.82
P/S ratio	2.93	7.09
P/B ratio	6.11	8.90
EV / EBITDA	32.84	37.51
FCF yield	7.58%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	HUBS	SIMO
Gross margin	83.25%	48.87%
Operating margin	3.83%	16.31%
Net margin	4.26%	22.06%
ROE	8.86%	27.68%
ROIC	5.70%	14.77%

Dividends

Metric	HUBS	SIMO
Dividend yield	N/A	0.70%
Payout ratio	N/A	5.85%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUBS	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	26.31%	14.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	39.65%	-42.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-19.59%	32.95%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or SIMO?: SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 69.81 and SIMO at 8.13. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUBS or SIMO?: Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 26.31% CAGR versus SIMO at 14.30%.
Does HUBS or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while HUBS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HUBS or SIMO more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 4.26% versus SIMO at 22.06%.
How have HUBS and SIMO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 15.40% and SIMO delivered 21.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUBS analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HubSpot P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield HubSpot ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE HubSpot operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin HubSpot revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth HubSpot free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

HubSpot & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.