Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or RMBS?

RMBS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 75.57 and RMBS at 44.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUBS or RMBS?

Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 26.31% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.

Is HUBS or RMBS more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 4.26% versus RMBS at 31.69%.

How have HUBS and RMBS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 15.40% and RMBS delivered 20.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)

A side-by-side comparison of HubSpot, Inc. and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HUBS

HubSpot, Inc.

$10.95B

$213.86TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

RMBS

Rambus Inc.

$10.52B

$96.96TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HUBS vs RMBS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HUBS +319.2% (+15.4%/yr)RMBS +558.9% (+20.7%/yr)RMBS compounded faster over this window

HUBS RMBS

HUBS vs RMBS: by the numbers

•HUBS is the larger company ($10.95B vs $10.52B market cap).
•RMBS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (44.48 vs 75.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 4.26% net margin).
•HUBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.31% vs 22.51% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUBS	RMBS
P/E ratio	75.57	44.48
Forward P/E	N/A	31.92
P/S ratio	3.18	13.90
P/B ratio	6.61	7.17
EV / EBITDA	35.76	34.42
FCF yield	7.00%	2.85%

Profitability

Metric	HUBS	RMBS
Gross margin	83.25%	78.27%
Operating margin	3.83%	35.51%
Net margin	4.26%	31.69%
ROE	8.86%	16.34%
ROIC	5.70%	14.56%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUBS	RMBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	26.31%	22.51%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	39.65%	14.08%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-19.59%	29.79%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or RMBS?: RMBS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 75.57 and RMBS at 44.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUBS or RMBS?: Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 26.31% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.
Is HUBS or RMBS more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 4.26% versus RMBS at 31.69%.
How have HUBS and RMBS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 15.40% and RMBS delivered 20.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUBS analysis Full RMBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HubSpot P/E ratio Rambus P/E ratio HubSpot ROE Rambus ROE HubSpot operating margin Rambus operating margin HubSpot revenue growth Rambus revenue growth HubSpot free cash flow Rambus free cash flow

HubSpot & Rambus appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.