Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or RMBS?

RMBS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 131.60 and RMBS at 37.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUBS or RMBS?

Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 27.85% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.

Is HUBS or RMBS more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 3.04% versus RMBS at 31.69%.

How have HUBS and RMBS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 16.49% and RMBS delivered 19.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs Rambus Inc. (RMBS)

A side-by-side comparison of HubSpot, Inc. and Rambus Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HUBS

HubSpot, Inc.

$11.94B

$233.10TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

RMBS

Rambus Inc.

$9.72B

$89.58TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HUBS vs RMBS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 12y

HUBS +734.3%RMBS +581.0%HUBS compounded faster

HUBS RMBS

HUBS vs RMBS: by the numbers

•HUBS is the larger company ($11.94B vs $9.72B market cap).
•RMBS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (37.99 vs 131.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.69% vs 3.04% net margin).
•HUBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.85% vs 22.51% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUBS	RMBS
P/E ratio	131.60	37.99
Forward P/E	N/A	27.29
P/S ratio	4.00	12.03
P/B ratio	6.61	6.20
PEG ratio	0.52	1.53
EV / EBITDA	60.42	30.91
FCF yield	5.40%	3.69%

Profitability

Metric	HUBS	RMBS
Gross margin	83.65%	78.27%
Operating margin	1.95%	35.51%
Net margin	3.04%	31.69%
ROE	5.02%	16.34%
ROIC	0.31%	15.03%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUBS	RMBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	27.85%	22.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	48.76%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	57.18%	16.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-15.50%	28.63%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or RMBS?: RMBS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 131.60 and RMBS at 37.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUBS or RMBS?: Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 27.85% CAGR versus RMBS at 22.51%.
Is HUBS or RMBS more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 3.04% versus RMBS at 31.69%.
How have HUBS and RMBS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 16.49% and RMBS delivered 19.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUBS analysis Full RMBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HubSpot P/E ratio Rambus P/E ratio HubSpot dividend yield Rambus dividend yield HubSpot ROE Rambus ROE HubSpot operating margin Rambus operating margin HubSpot revenue growth Rambus revenue growth HubSpot free cash flow Rambus free cash flow

HubSpot & Rambus appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.