Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or ONTO?

HUBS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 116.87 and ONTO at 122.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUBS or ONTO?

Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 27.85% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.

Is HUBS or ONTO more profitable?

ONTO runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 3.04% versus ONTO at 10.33%.

How have HUBS and ONTO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 15.73% and ONTO delivered 27.97% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)

A side-by-side comparison of HubSpot, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HUBS

HubSpot, Inc.

$12.19B

$238.04TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

ONTO

Onto Innovation Inc.

$12.03B

$241.89TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HUBS vs ONTO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 12y

HUBS +640.9%ONTO +1622.2%ONTO compounded faster

HUBS ONTO

HUBS vs ONTO: by the numbers

•HUBS is the larger company ($12.19B vs $12.03B market cap).
•HUBS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (116.87 vs 122.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ONTO converts more revenue to profit (10.33% vs 3.04% net margin).
•HUBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.85% vs 11.93% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUBS	ONTO
P/E ratio	116.87	122.58
Forward P/E	N/A	52.80
P/S ratio	3.56	12.73
P/B ratio	5.87	6.15
PEG ratio	0.52	N/A
EV / EBITDA	53.28	68.27
FCF yield	6.08%	1.82%

Profitability

Metric	HUBS	ONTO
Gross margin	83.65%	48.80%
Operating margin	1.95%	10.53%
Net margin	3.04%	10.33%
ROE	5.02%	4.99%
ROIC	0.31%	5.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUBS	ONTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	27.85%	11.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-0.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	57.18%	11.03%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-17.57%	29.23%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or ONTO?: HUBS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 116.87 and ONTO at 122.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUBS or ONTO?: Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 27.85% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.
Is HUBS or ONTO more profitable?: ONTO runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 3.04% versus ONTO at 10.33%.
How have HUBS and ONTO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 15.73% and ONTO delivered 27.97% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUBS analysis Full ONTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HubSpot P/E ratio Onto Innovation P/E ratio HubSpot dividend yield Onto Innovation dividend yield HubSpot ROE Onto Innovation ROE HubSpot operating margin Onto Innovation operating margin HubSpot revenue growth Onto Innovation revenue growth HubSpot free cash flow Onto Innovation free cash flow

HubSpot & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.