Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or ONTO?

HUBS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 87.00 and ONTO at 95.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HUBS or ONTO?

Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 26.31% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.67%.

Is HUBS or ONTO more profitable?

ONTO runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 4.26% versus ONTO at 11.84%.

How have HUBS and ONTO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 15.40% and ONTO delivered 29.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)

A side-by-side comparison of HubSpot, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HUBS

HubSpot, Inc.

$12.61B

$246.22TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 12:14 PM EDT

ONTO

Onto Innovation Inc.

$12.66B

$254.56TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 12:14 PM EDT

Total return — HUBS vs ONTO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HUBS +313.4% (+15.3%/yr)ONTO +1240.6% (+29.6%/yr)ONTO compounded faster over this window

HUBS ONTO

HUBS vs ONTO: by the numbers

•ONTO is the larger company ($12.66B vs $12.61B market cap).
•HUBS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (87.00 vs 95.70 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ONTO converts more revenue to profit (11.84% vs 4.26% net margin).
•HUBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.31% vs 11.67% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HUBS	ONTO
P/E ratio	87.00	95.70
Forward P/E	N/A	31.37
P/S ratio	3.66	11.30
P/B ratio	7.61	6.59
EV / EBITDA	41.55	52.27
FCF yield	6.08%	1.99%

Profitability

Metric	HUBS	ONTO
Gross margin	83.25%	50.36%
Operating margin	3.83%	12.48%
Net margin	4.26%	11.84%
ROE	8.86%	6.90%
ROIC	5.70%	3.42%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HUBS	ONTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	26.31%	11.67%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-0.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	39.65%	15.11%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-19.59%	29.60%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HUBS or ONTO?: HUBS has the lower trailing P/E: HUBS trades at 87.00 and ONTO at 95.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HUBS or ONTO?: Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — HUBS at a 26.31% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.67%.
Is HUBS or ONTO more profitable?: ONTO runs the higher net margin — HUBS at 4.26% versus ONTO at 11.84%.
How have HUBS and ONTO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HUBS delivered 15.40% and ONTO delivered 29.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HUBS analysis Full ONTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

HubSpot P/E ratio Onto Innovation P/E ratio HubSpot ROE Onto Innovation ROE HubSpot operating margin Onto Innovation operating margin HubSpot revenue growth Onto Innovation revenue growth HubSpot free cash flow Onto Innovation free cash flow

HubSpot & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.