Which has grown faster, HP or LU?

Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — HP at a 30.24% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.

Does HP or LU pay a bigger dividend?

HP pays a dividend (2.55% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Which has been the better investment, HP or LU?

Over the past 5-year, HP delivered the higher annualized total return — HP at -0.26% versus LU at -40.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) vs Lufax Holding Ltd (LU)

HP leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and Lufax Holding Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

$1.33Financial Services

Total return — HP vs LU

growth of $100 · last 6y

HP +164.0%LU -97.4%HP compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

HP LU

HP vs LU: by the numbers

•HP is the larger company ($3.92B vs $558M market cap).
•Both run net losses; HP's is the smaller (-9.39% vs -10.59% net margin).
•HP grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.24% vs -6.44% CAGR).
•HP pays a dividend (2.55% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, HP or LU?

Metric tally: HP 7 · LU 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityHP(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	HP	LU
Forward P/E	24.86	—
P/S ratio	0.98	0.09●
P/B ratio	1.55	0.05●
EV / EBITDA	11.12●	72.98
FCF yield	6.53%	312.50%●

Profitability

Metric	HP	LU
Gross margin	11.29%	41.96%●
Operating margin	-1.85%●	-4.31%
Net margin	-9.39%●	-10.59%
ROE	-14.86%	-4.14%●
ROIC	3.92%●	-0.21%

Dividends

Metric	HP	LU
Dividend yield	2.55%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HP	LU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	30.24%●	-6.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-4.17%●	-43.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-2.32%	24.09%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.73%●	-40.92%

Frequently asked

Which is better, HP or LU?: It depends on your goal. growth: HP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: HP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HP leads 7 to 6.
Which has grown faster, HP or LU?: Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — HP at a 30.24% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.
Does HP or LU pay a bigger dividend?: HP pays a dividend (2.55% yield) while LU does not currently pay one.
Which has been the better investment, HP or LU?: Over the past 5-year, HP delivered the higher annualized total return — HP at -0.26% versus LU at -40.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HP analysis Full LU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Helmerich & Payne P/E ratio Lufax P/E ratio Helmerich & Payne dividend yield Lufax dividend yield Helmerich & Payne ROE Lufax ROE Helmerich & Payne operating margin Lufax operating margin Helmerich & Payne revenue growth Lufax revenue growth Helmerich & Payne free cash flow Lufax free cash flow

Helmerich & Payne & Lufax appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.