Is HLT or SE cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SE is cheaper: HLT trades at a 52.82 P/E and SE at 32.15.

Which has grown faster, HLT or SE?

Over the past five years, SE grew revenue faster — HLT at a 30.37% CAGR versus SE at 35.96%.

Does HLT or SE pay a bigger dividend?

HLT pays a dividend (0.17% yield) while SE does not currently pay one.

Is HLT or SE more profitable?

HLT runs the higher net margin — HLT at 12.56% versus SE at 6.40%.

Which has been the better investment, HLT or SE?

Over the past 5-year, HLT delivered the higher annualized total return — HLT at 23.59% versus SE at -21.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) vs Sea Limited (SE)

SE leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Sea Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

HLT

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

$78.75B

$345.95Consumer Cyclical

Sea Limited

$50.80B

$82.94Consumer Cyclical

Total return — HLT vs SE

growth of $100 · last 9y

HLT +387.0%SE +410.1%SE compounded faster

HLT SE

HLT vs SE: by the numbers

•HLT is the larger company ($78.75B vs $50.80B market cap).
•SE trades at the lower earnings multiple (32.15 vs 52.82 P/E).
•HLT converts more revenue to profit (12.56% vs 6.40% net margin).
•SE grew revenue faster over the past five years (35.96% vs 30.37% CAGR).
•HLT pays a dividend (0.17% yield) while SE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, HLT or SE?

Metric tally: HLT 4 · SE 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSE(lower P/E)

GrowthSE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityHLT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	HLT	SE
P/E ratio	52.82	32.15●
Forward P/E	33.33	17.01●
P/S ratio	6.54	2.09●
P/B ratio	—	4.11
PEG ratio	4.27	0.20●
EV / EBITDA	30.86	19.35●
FCF yield	2.69%	6.03%●

Profitability

Metric	HLT	SE
Gross margin	44.29%	44.27%
Operating margin	23.08%●	8.20%
Net margin	12.56%●	6.40%
ROE	-27.04%	12.54%●
ROIC	11.29%●	8.10%

Dividends

Metric	HLT	SE
Dividend yield	0.17%	—
Payout ratio	9.71%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HLT	SE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	30.37%	35.96%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.36%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	45.28%	97.91%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	22.20%●	-21.46%

Frequently asked

Which is better, HLT or SE?: It depends on your goal. value: SE (lower P/E); growth: SE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: HLT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SE leads 9 to 4.
Is HLT or SE cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SE is cheaper: HLT trades at a 52.82 P/E and SE at 32.15.
Which has grown faster, HLT or SE?: Over the past five years, SE grew revenue faster — HLT at a 30.37% CAGR versus SE at 35.96%.
Does HLT or SE pay a bigger dividend?: HLT pays a dividend (0.17% yield) while SE does not currently pay one.
Is HLT or SE more profitable?: HLT runs the higher net margin — HLT at 12.56% versus SE at 6.40%.
Which has been the better investment, HLT or SE?: Over the past 5-year, HLT delivered the higher annualized total return — HLT at 23.59% versus SE at -21.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HLT analysis Full SE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hilton Worldwide P/E ratio Sea P/E ratio Hilton Worldwide dividend yield Sea dividend yield Hilton Worldwide ROE Sea ROE Hilton Worldwide operating margin Sea operating margin Hilton Worldwide revenue growth Sea revenue growth Hilton Worldwide free cash flow Sea free cash flow

Hilton Worldwide & Sea appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.