Which has the lower trailing P/E, HIG or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: HIG trades at 9.12 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HIG or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — HIG at a 6.62% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Does HIG or NA pay a bigger dividend?

HIG pays a dividend (1.66% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HIG or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — HIG at 15.03% versus NA at 505.49%.

The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. (HIG) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: HIG is classified in Financial Services; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

HIG

The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.

$39.32B

$143.42Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HIG vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

HIG +134.1%NA -98.4%HIG compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

HIG NA

HIG vs NA: by the numbers

•HIG is the larger company ($39.32B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 9.12 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 15.03% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 6.62% CAGR).
•HIG pays a dividend (1.66% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HIG	NA
P/E ratio	9.12	2.30
Forward P/E	11.10	N/A
P/S ratio	1.36	11.40
P/B ratio	2.02	0.41
PEG ratio	0.36	N/A
EV / EBITDA	N/A	6.44

Profitability

Metric	HIG	NA
Gross margin	46.08%	-147.33%
Operating margin	13.05%	-396.84%
Net margin	15.03%	505.49%
ROE	22.23%	17.96%
ROIC	28.21%	-10.96%

Dividends

Metric	HIG	NA
Dividend yield	1.66%	N/A
Payout ratio	17.17%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HIG	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.62%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	23.05%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.02%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HIG or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: HIG trades at 9.12 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HIG or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — HIG at a 6.62% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Does HIG or NA pay a bigger dividend?: HIG pays a dividend (1.66% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HIG or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — HIG at 15.03% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full HIG analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hartford Insurance P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio Hartford Insurance dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield Hartford Insurance ROE Nano Labs ROE Hartford Insurance operating margin Nano Labs operating margin Hartford Insurance revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth Hartford Insurance free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

Hartford Insurance & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.