Which has the lower trailing P/E, HIFS or SLRC?

SLRC has the lower trailing P/E: HIFS trades at 9.40 and SLRC at 8.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HIFS or SLRC?

Over the past five years, HIFS grew revenue faster — HIFS at a 14.19% CAGR versus SLRC at 9.47%.

Does HIFS or SLRC pay a bigger dividend?

HIFS yields 1.13% and SLRC yields 12.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is HIFS or SLRC more profitable?

SLRC runs the higher net margin — HIFS at 27.02% versus SLRC at 41.33%.

How have HIFS and SLRC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HIFS delivered 8.73% and SLRC delivered 3.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) vs SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC)

A side-by-side comparison of Hingham Institution for Savings and SLR Investment Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HIFS

Hingham Institution for Savings

$615M

$282.13Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

SLRC

SLR Investment Corp.

$624M

$11.44Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

Total return — HIFS vs SLRC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HIFS +128.7% (+8.6%/yr)SLRC +46.4% (+3.9%/yr)HIFS compounded faster over this window

HIFS SLRC

HIFS vs SLRC: by the numbers

•SLRC is the larger company ($624M vs $615M market cap).
•SLRC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.47 vs 9.40 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SLRC converts more revenue to profit (41.33% vs 27.02% net margin).
•HIFS grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.19% vs 9.47% CAGR).
•SLRC pays the higher dividend yield (12.51% vs 1.13%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HIFS	SLRC
P/E ratio	9.40	8.47
Forward P/E	N/A	8.76
PEG ratio	7.46	0.24
P/S ratio	2.51	3.50
P/B ratio	1.21	0.64

Profitability

Metric	HIFS	SLRC
Gross margin	N/A	66.03%
Operating margin	35.75%	72.88%
Net margin	27.02%	41.33%
ROE	13.07%	7.51%

Hingham Institution for Savings: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	HIFS	SLRC
Dividend yield	1.13%	12.51%
Payout ratio	10.73%	106.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HIFS	SLRC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.19%	9.47%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	1.03%	35.66%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-3.11%	-0.12%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HIFS or SLRC?: SLRC has the lower trailing P/E: HIFS trades at 9.40 and SLRC at 8.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HIFS or SLRC?: Over the past five years, HIFS grew revenue faster — HIFS at a 14.19% CAGR versus SLRC at 9.47%.
Does HIFS or SLRC pay a bigger dividend?: HIFS yields 1.13% and SLRC yields 12.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is HIFS or SLRC more profitable?: SLRC runs the higher net margin — HIFS at 27.02% versus SLRC at 41.33%.
How have HIFS and SLRC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HIFS delivered 8.73% and SLRC delivered 3.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HIFS analysis Full SLRC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hingham Institution for Savings P/E ratio SLR Investment P/E ratio Hingham Institution for Savings dividend yield SLR Investment dividend yield Hingham Institution for Savings ROE SLR Investment ROE Hingham Institution for Savings operating margin SLR Investment operating margin Hingham Institution for Savings revenue growth SLR Investment revenue growth

Hingham Institution for Savings & SLR Investment appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.