Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) vs Hypoport SE (HYPOF)
A side-by-side comparison of Hingham Institution for Savings and Hypoport SE across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — HIFS vs HYPOF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yHIFS vs HYPOF: by the numbers
- •HYPOF is the larger company ($631M vs $624M market cap).
- •HIFS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.54 vs 18.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •HIFS converts more revenue to profit (27.02% vs 4.63% net margin).
- •HIFS grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.19% vs 7.95% CAGR).
- •HIFS pays a dividend (1.13% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HIFS | HYPOF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.54 | 18.99 |
| PEG ratio | 7.57 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 2.54 | 0.88 |
| P/B ratio | 1.23 | 1.44 |
Profitability
| Metric | HIFS | HYPOF |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 35.75% | 4.49% |
| Net margin | 27.02% | 4.63% |
| ROE | 13.07% | 7.58% |
Hingham Institution for Savings: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.
Hypoport SE: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.
Dividends
| Metric | HIFS | HYPOF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 10.73% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HIFS | HYPOF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.19% | 7.95% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 1.03% | -2.99% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -3.11% | -31.74% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, HIFS or HYPOF?
- HIFS has the lower trailing P/E: HIFS trades at 9.54 and HYPOF at 18.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, HIFS or HYPOF?
- Over the past five years, HIFS grew revenue faster — HIFS at a 14.19% CAGR versus HYPOF at 7.95%.
- Does HIFS or HYPOF pay a bigger dividend?
- HIFS pays a dividend (1.13% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is HIFS or HYPOF more profitable?
- HIFS runs the higher net margin — HIFS at 27.02% versus HYPOF at 4.63%.
- How have HIFS and HYPOF total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, HIFS delivered -3.11% and HYPOF delivered -31.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Hingham Institution for Savings & Hypoport SE appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.