Which has the lower trailing P/E, GS or WFC?

WFC has the lower trailing P/E: GS trades at 16.18 and WFC at 12.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GS or WFC?

Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — GS at a 13.76% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.

Does GS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

GS yields 1.62% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GS or WFC more profitable?

GS runs the higher net margin — GS at 17.78% versus WFC at 17.54%.

How have GS and WFC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GS delivered 22.84% and WFC delivered 9.12% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

A side-by-side comparison of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

$304.84B

$1,033.34Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WFC

Wells Fargo & Company

$265.84B

$86.87Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

Total return — GS vs WFC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27y

GS +2019.5%WFC +727.6%GS compounded faster

GS WFC

GS vs WFC: by the numbers

•GS is the larger company ($304.84B vs $265.84B market cap).
•WFC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.59 vs 16.18 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GS converts more revenue to profit (17.78% vs 17.54% net margin).
•GS grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.76% vs 9.78% CAGR).
•WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 1.62%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GS	WFC
P/E ratio	16.18	12.59
Forward P/E	15.11	12.02
P/S ratio	2.71	2.08
P/B ratio	2.60	1.49
PEG ratio	0.65	0.82

Profitability

Metric	GS	WFC
Gross margin	47.48%	64.50%
Operating margin	24.81%	21.17%
Net margin	17.78%	17.54%
ROE	17.05%	12.57%
ROIC	1.92%	3.16%

Dividends

Metric	GS	WFC
Dividend yield	1.62%	2.06%
Payout ratio	32.72%	28.17%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GS	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.76%	9.78%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.75%	72.38%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.27%	16.70%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GS or WFC?: WFC has the lower trailing P/E: GS trades at 16.18 and WFC at 12.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GS or WFC?: Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — GS at a 13.76% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.
Does GS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: GS yields 1.62% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GS or WFC more profitable?: GS runs the higher net margin — GS at 17.78% versus WFC at 17.54%.
How have GS and WFC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GS delivered 22.84% and WFC delivered 9.12% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GS analysis Full WFC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Goldman Sachs P/E ratio Wells Fargo & P/E ratio Goldman Sachs dividend yield Wells Fargo & dividend yield Goldman Sachs ROE Wells Fargo & ROE Goldman Sachs operating margin Wells Fargo & operating margin Goldman Sachs revenue growth Wells Fargo & revenue growth Goldman Sachs free cash flow Wells Fargo & free cash flow

Goldman Sachs & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.