The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

WFC leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. logo
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$313.52B
$1062.75Financial Services
Wells Fargo & Company logo
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$256.26B
$83.74Financial Services

Total return — GS vs WFC

growth of $100 · last 27y
GS +1410.0%WFC +282.2%GS compounded faster
05001k2kStart $10020042009201420192024$1,510$382
GS WFC

GS vs WFC: by the numbers

  • •GS is the larger company ($313.52B vs $256.26B market cap).
  • •WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.82 vs 19.41 P/E).
  • •WFC converts more revenue to profit (17.29% vs 16.31% net margin).
  • •GS grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.83% vs 9.46% CAGR).
  • •WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 1.60%).

Which is better, GS or WFC?

Metric tally: GS 5 · WFC 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueWFC(lower P/E)
GrowthGS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)
QualityWFC(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricGSWFC
P/E ratio19.4112.82●
Forward P/E17.9311.96●
P/S ratio2.952.14●
P/B ratio2.671.51●
PEG ratio0.61●0.79
EV / EBITDA42.9017.27●
FCF yield—0.44%

Profitability

MetricGSWFC
Gross margin55.55%64.55%●
Operating margin20.48%20.47%
Net margin16.31%17.29%●
ROE14.72%●12.18%
ROIC1.92%3.16%●

Dividends

MetricGSWFC
Dividend yield1.60%2.15%●
Payout ratio32.72%28.17%

Growth (annualized)

MetricGSWFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)12.83%●9.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.75%72.38%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)1.47%●-10.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)25.96%●15.64%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GS or WFC?
It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: GS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: WFC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFC leads 10 to 5.
Is GS or WFC cheaper?
On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: GS trades at a 19.41 P/E and WFC at 12.82.
Which has grown faster, GS or WFC?
Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — GS at a 12.83% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
Does GS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?
GS yields 1.60% and WFC yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GS or WFC more profitable?
WFC runs the higher net margin — GS at 16.31% versus WFC at 17.29%.
Which has been the better investment, GS or WFC?
Over the past 10-year, GS delivered the higher annualized total return — GS at 24.15% versus WFC at 8.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GS analysisFull WFC analysisInteractive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Goldman Sachs P/E ratioWells Fargo & P/E ratioGoldman Sachs dividend yieldWells Fargo & dividend yieldGoldman Sachs ROEWells Fargo & ROEGoldman Sachs operating marginWells Fargo & operating marginGoldman Sachs revenue growthWells Fargo & revenue growthGoldman Sachs free cash flowWells Fargo & free cash flow

Goldman Sachs & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield StocksBest 10-Year Total Return StocksLowest P/E Ratio StocksLargest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.