Which has the lower trailing P/E, GS or WFC?

WFC has the lower trailing P/E: GS trades at 15.89 and WFC at 13.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GS or WFC?

Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — GS at a 13.76% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.

Does GS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

GS yields 1.77% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GS or WFC more profitable?

GS runs the higher net margin — GS at 17.78% versus WFC at 17.54%.

How have GS and WFC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GS delivered 22.22% and WFC delivered 9.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

A side-by-side comparison of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

$303.62B

$1,029.18Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WFC

Wells Fargo & Company

$272.95B

$90.26Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — GS vs WFC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

GS +620.7% (+21.8%/yr)WFC +137.2% (+9.0%/yr)GS compounded faster over this window

GS WFC

GS vs WFC: by the numbers

•GS is the larger company ($303.62B vs $272.95B market cap).
•WFC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.02 vs 15.89 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GS converts more revenue to profit (17.78% vs 17.54% net margin).
•GS grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.76% vs 9.78% CAGR).
•WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 1.77%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GS	WFC
P/E ratio	15.89	13.02
Forward P/E	14.65	12.38
P/S ratio	2.57	2.11
P/B ratio	2.47	1.51

Profitability

Metric	GS	WFC
Gross margin	47.48%	64.50%
Operating margin	24.81%	21.17%
Net margin	17.78%	17.54%
ROE	17.09%	12.57%

Dividends

Metric	GS	WFC
Dividend yield	1.77%	2.06%
Payout ratio	27.79%	26.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GS	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.76%	9.78%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.75%	72.38%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	23.33%	17.97%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GS or WFC?: WFC has the lower trailing P/E: GS trades at 15.89 and WFC at 13.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GS or WFC?: Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — GS at a 13.76% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.
Does GS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: GS yields 1.77% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GS or WFC more profitable?: GS runs the higher net margin — GS at 17.78% versus WFC at 17.54%.
How have GS and WFC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GS delivered 22.22% and WFC delivered 9.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GS analysis Full WFC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Goldman Sachs P/E ratio Wells Fargo P/E ratio Goldman Sachs dividend yield Wells Fargo dividend yield Goldman Sachs ROE Wells Fargo ROE Goldman Sachs operating margin Wells Fargo operating margin Goldman Sachs revenue growth Wells Fargo revenue growth

Goldman Sachs & Wells Fargo appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.