Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH)
FT leads on 10 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$8.05Financial Services
WASH
Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.
$36.89Financial Services
Total return — FT vs WASH
growth of $100 · last 30yFT -10.6%WASH +245.7%WASH compounded faster
FT WASH
FT vs WASH: by the numbers
- •WASH is the larger company ($703M vs $202M market cap).
- •FT trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.00 vs 13.51 P/E).
- •FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 13.93% net margin).
- •WASH grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.45% vs 3.92% CAGR).
- •FT pays the higher dividend yield (6.34% vs 6.07%).
Which is better, FT or WASH?
Metric tally: FT 10 · WASH 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFT(lower P/E)
GrowthWASH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFT(higher dividend yield)
QualityFT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FT | WASH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 3.00● | 13.51 |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.84 |
| P/S ratio | 5.42 | 1.87● |
| P/B ratio | 0.89● | 1.29 |
Profitability
| Metric | FT | WASH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.88%● | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 119.92%● | 17.94% |
| Net margin | 179.50%● | 13.93% |
| ROE | 29.45%● | 9.63% |
| ROIC | 8.38%● | -1.72% |
Dividends
| Metric | FT | WASH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.34%● | 6.07% |
| Payout ratio | 67.11% | 82.35% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FT | WASH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.92% | 7.45%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.82%● | -7.56% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.97%● | -0.44% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FT or WASH?
- It depends on your goal. value: FT (lower P/E); growth: WASH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FT (higher dividend yield); quality: FT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 10 to 2.
- Is FT or WASH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: FT trades at a 3.00 P/E and WASH at 13.51.
- Which has grown faster, FT or WASH?
- Over the past five years, WASH grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus WASH at 7.45%.
- Does FT or WASH pay a bigger dividend?
- FT yields 6.34% and WASH yields 6.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FT or WASH more profitable?
- FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus WASH at 13.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, FT or WASH?
- Over the past 10-year, FT delivered the higher annualized total return — FT at 8.43% versus WASH at 5.12%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Franklin Universal P/E ratioWashington Trust Bancorp P/E ratioFranklin Universal dividend yieldWashington Trust Bancorp dividend yieldFranklin Universal ROEWashington Trust Bancorp ROEFranklin Universal operating marginWashington Trust Bancorp operating marginFranklin Universal revenue growthWashington Trust Bancorp revenue growthFranklin Universal free cash flowWashington Trust Bancorp free cash flow
Franklin Universal & Washington Trust Bancorp appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.