Which has the lower trailing P/E, FISV or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: FISV trades at 8.87 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FISV or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — FISV at a 7.29% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Is FISV or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — FISV at 15.17% versus NA at 505.49%.

Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of Fiserv, Inc. and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FISV

Fiserv, Inc.

$28.91B

$54.21TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FISV vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

FISV -44.3%NA -98.4%FISV compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FISV NA

FISV vs NA: by the numbers

•FISV is the larger company ($28.91B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 8.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 15.17% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 7.29% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FISV	NA
P/E ratio	8.87	2.30
Forward P/E	6.45	N/A
P/S ratio	1.33	11.40
P/B ratio	1.07	0.41
PEG ratio	0.62	N/A
EV / EBITDA	6.76	6.44
FCF yield	14.84%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	FISV	NA
Gross margin	58.07%	-147.33%
Operating margin	24.38%	-396.84%
Net margin	15.17%	505.49%
ROE	12.21%	17.96%
ROIC	8.03%	-10.96%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FISV	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.29%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	34.70%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.58%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-14.53%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FISV or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: FISV trades at 8.87 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FISV or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — FISV at a 7.29% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Is FISV or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — FISV at 15.17% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full FISV analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fiserv P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio Fiserv dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield Fiserv ROE Nano Labs ROE Fiserv operating margin Nano Labs operating margin Fiserv revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth Fiserv free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

Fiserv & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.