Which has the lower trailing P/E, FISV or MTSI?

FISV has the lower trailing P/E: FISV trades at 8.51 and MTSI at 103.41. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FISV or MTSI?

Over the past five years, MTSI grew revenue faster — FISV at a 6.23% CAGR versus MTSI at 14.21%.

Is FISV or MTSI more profitable?

MTSI runs the higher net margin — FISV at 13.42% versus MTSI at 20.70%.

How have FISV and MTSI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FISV delivered -1.14% and MTSI delivered 22.47% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) vs MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI)

A side-by-side comparison of Fiserv, Inc. and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FISV

Fiserv, Inc.

$23.66B

$44.36TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MTSI

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

$24.54B

$321.60TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FISV vs MTSI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FISV -11.5% (-1.2%/yr)MTSI +638.8% (+22.1%/yr)MTSI compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FISV MTSI

FISV vs MTSI: by the numbers

•MTSI is the larger company ($24.54B vs $23.66B market cap).
•FISV trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.51 vs 103.41 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MTSI converts more revenue to profit (20.70% vs 13.42% net margin).
•MTSI grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.21% vs 6.23% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FISV	MTSI
P/E ratio	8.51	103.41
Forward P/E	6.12	58.34
PEG ratio	0.24	N/A
P/S ratio	1.13	21.08
P/B ratio	0.88	15.92
EV / EBITDA	7.11	93.23
FCF yield	16.60%	0.48%

Profitability

Metric	FISV	MTSI
Gross margin	59.36%	56.56%
Operating margin	21.37%	18.11%
Net margin	13.42%	20.70%
ROE	10.41%	15.64%
ROIC	6.47%	8.94%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FISV	MTSI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.23%	14.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	34.70%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.32%	4.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-16.57%	37.52%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FISV or MTSI?: FISV has the lower trailing P/E: FISV trades at 8.51 and MTSI at 103.41. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FISV or MTSI?: Over the past five years, MTSI grew revenue faster — FISV at a 6.23% CAGR versus MTSI at 14.21%.
Is FISV or MTSI more profitable?: MTSI runs the higher net margin — FISV at 13.42% versus MTSI at 20.70%.
How have FISV and MTSI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FISV delivered -1.14% and MTSI delivered 22.47% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FISV analysis Full MTSI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fiserv P/E ratio MACOM Technology Solutions P/E ratio Fiserv ROE MACOM Technology Solutions ROE Fiserv operating margin MACOM Technology Solutions operating margin Fiserv revenue growth MACOM Technology Solutions revenue growth Fiserv free cash flow MACOM Technology Solutions free cash flow

Fiserv & MACOM Technology Solutions appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.