Ferrovial SE (FER) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL)
UAL leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ferrovial SE and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FER
Ferrovial SE
$64.15IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 11:01 AM EDT
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$122.18IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 11:00 AM EDT
Total return — FER vs UAL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yFER +695.7%UAL +553.2%FER compounded faster
FER UAL
FER vs UAL: by the numbers
- •FER is the larger company ($46.23B vs $39.66B market cap).
- •UAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.74 vs 60.21 P/E).
- •FER converts more revenue to profit (8.85% vs 6.06% net margin).
- •UAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (41.67% vs 8.70% CAGR).
- •FER pays a dividend (2.03% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FER or UAL?
Metric tally: FER 3 · UAL 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUAL(lower P/E)
GrowthUAL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityUAL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FER | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 60.21 | 10.74● |
| Forward P/E | 64.89 | 11.60● |
| P/S ratio | 4.06 | 0.65● |
| P/B ratio | 6.61 | 2.48● |
| PEG ratio | 4.82 | 1.67● |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.35 | 7.74● |
| FCF yield | 3.25% | 8.16%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FER | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 93.70%● | 64.24% |
| Operating margin | 10.36%● | 8.44% |
| Net margin | 8.85%● | 6.06% |
| ROE | 14.38% | 23.09%● |
| ROIC | 5.32% | 6.63%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FER | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | — |
| Payout ratio | 91.65% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FER | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.70% | 41.67%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.48% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.35% | 61.78%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.57% | 20.10%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FER or UAL?
- It depends on your goal. value: UAL (lower P/E); growth: UAL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: UAL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UAL leads 12 to 3.
- Is FER or UAL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UAL is cheaper: FER trades at a 60.21 P/E and UAL at 10.74.
- Which has grown faster, FER or UAL?
- Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — FER at a 8.70% CAGR versus UAL at 41.67%.
- Does FER or UAL pay a bigger dividend?
- FER pays a dividend (2.03% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
- Is FER or UAL more profitable?
- FER runs the higher net margin — FER at 8.85% versus UAL at 6.06%.
- Which has been the better investment, FER or UAL?
- Over the past 10-year, FER delivered the higher annualized total return — FER at 14.02% versus UAL at 9.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ferrovial SE P/E ratioUnited Airlines P/E ratioFerrovial SE dividend yieldUnited Airlines dividend yieldFerrovial SE ROEUnited Airlines ROEFerrovial SE operating marginUnited Airlines operating marginFerrovial SE revenue growthUnited Airlines revenue growthFerrovial SE free cash flowUnited Airlines free cash flow
Ferrovial SE & United Airlines appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.