Which has grown faster, F or HLT?

Over the past five years, HLT grew revenue faster — F at a 8.03% CAGR versus HLT at 30.37%.

Does F or HLT pay a bigger dividend?

F yields 4.04% and HLT yields 0.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is F or HLT more profitable?

HLT runs the higher net margin — F at -3.22% versus HLT at 12.56%.

Which has been the better investment, F or HLT?

Over the past 10-year, HLT delivered the higher annualized total return — F at 6.07% versus HLT at 23.59%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ford Motor Company (F) vs Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT)

HLT leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ford Motor Company and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Ford Motor Company

$58.08B

$14.84Consumer Cyclical

HLT

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

$78.75B

$345.95Consumer Cyclical

Total return — F vs HLT

growth of $100 · last 12y

F -9.5%HLT +684.3%HLT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

F HLT

F vs HLT: by the numbers

•HLT is the larger company ($78.75B vs $58.08B market cap).
•HLT is profitable (12.56% net margin) while F runs a net loss (-3.22%).
•HLT grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.37% vs 8.03% CAGR).
•F pays the higher dividend yield (4.04% vs 0.17%).

Which is better, F or HLT?

Metric tally: F 6 · HLT 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHLT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeF(higher dividend yield)

QualityHLT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	F	HLT
P/E ratio	—	52.82
Forward P/E	8.10●	33.33
P/S ratio	0.32●	6.54
P/B ratio	1.61	—
PEG ratio	—	4.27
EV / EBITDA	274.95	30.86●
FCF yield	15.80%●	2.69%

Profitability

Metric	F	HLT
Gross margin	9.18%	44.29%●
Operating margin	1.84%	23.08%●
Net margin	-3.22%	12.56%●
ROE	-16.30%●	-27.04%
ROIC	0.75%	11.29%●

Dividends

Metric	F	HLT
Dividend yield	4.04%●	0.17%
Payout ratio	—	9.71%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	F	HLT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.03%	30.37%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	171.57%●	12.36%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-16.77%	45.28%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.23%	22.20%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, F or HLT?: It depends on your goal. growth: HLT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: F (higher dividend yield); quality: HLT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HLT leads 8 to 6.
Which has grown faster, F or HLT?: Over the past five years, HLT grew revenue faster — F at a 8.03% CAGR versus HLT at 30.37%.
Does F or HLT pay a bigger dividend?: F yields 4.04% and HLT yields 0.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is F or HLT more profitable?: HLT runs the higher net margin — F at -3.22% versus HLT at 12.56%.
Which has been the better investment, F or HLT?: Over the past 10-year, HLT delivered the higher annualized total return — F at 6.07% versus HLT at 23.59%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full F analysis Full HLT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ford Motor P/E ratio Hilton Worldwide P/E ratio Ford Motor dividend yield Hilton Worldwide dividend yield Ford Motor ROE Hilton Worldwide ROE Ford Motor operating margin Hilton Worldwide operating margin Ford Motor revenue growth Hilton Worldwide revenue growth Ford Motor free cash flow Hilton Worldwide free cash flow

Ford Motor & Hilton Worldwide appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.