Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX)
PSIX leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Power Solutions International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$33.78Industrials
PSIX
Power Solutions International, Inc.
$34.68Industrials
Total return — EPAC vs PSIX
growth of $100 · last 14yEPAC +28.3%PSIX +87.4%PSIX compounded faster
EPAC PSIX
EPAC vs PSIX: by the numbers
- •EPAC is the larger company ($1.78B vs $799M market cap).
- •PSIX trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.80 vs 20.60 P/E).
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 14.28% net margin).
- •PSIX grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.64% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while PSIX does not currently pay one.
Which is better, EPAC or PSIX?
Metric tally: EPAC 6 · PSIX 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePSIX(lower P/E)
GrowthPSIX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPSIX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | PSIX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.60 | 7.80● |
| Forward P/E | 19.46 | 14.56● |
| P/S ratio | 2.97 | 1.12● |
| P/B ratio | 4.43 | 4.30● |
| PEG ratio | 2.78 | 0.18● |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.69 | 8.96● |
| FCF yield | 5.97%● | 3.25% |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | PSIX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.05%● | 24.16% |
| Operating margin | 21.76%● | 13.48% |
| Net margin | 14.72%● | 14.28% |
| ROE | 22.01% | 55.01%● |
| ROIC | 15.12% | 30.51%● |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | PSIX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | — |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | PSIX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.10% | 11.64%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53%● | 53.38% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 34.85%● | 8.05% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.87% | 41.97%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EPAC or PSIX?
- It depends on your goal. value: PSIX (lower P/E); growth: PSIX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PSIX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PSIX leads 10 to 6.
- Is EPAC or PSIX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PSIX is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 20.60 P/E and PSIX at 7.80.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or PSIX?
- Over the past five years, PSIX grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus PSIX at 11.64%.
- Does EPAC or PSIX pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while PSIX does not currently pay one.
- Is EPAC or PSIX more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus PSIX at 14.28%.
- Which has been the better investment, EPAC or PSIX?
- Over the past 10-year, PSIX delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 4.91% versus PSIX at 5.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioPower Solutions International P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldPower Solutions International dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROEPower Solutions International ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginPower Solutions International operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthPower Solutions International revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowPower Solutions International free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & Power Solutions International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.