Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or PSIX?

PSIX has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 20.17 and PSIX at 15.81. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EPAC or PSIX?

Over the past five years, PSIX grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus PSIX at 9.42%.

Does EPAC or PSIX pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while PSIX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is EPAC or PSIX more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus PSIX at 10.03%.

How have EPAC and PSIX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 4.95% and PSIX delivered 13.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX)

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Power Solutions International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.84B

$35.70IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PSIX

Power Solutions International, Inc.

$1.08B

$46.65IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EPAC vs PSIX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

EPAC +53.3% (+4.4%/yr)PSIX +260.2% (+13.7%/yr)PSIX compounded faster over this window

EPAC PSIX

EPAC vs PSIX: by the numbers

•EPAC is the larger company ($1.84B vs $1.08B market cap).
•PSIX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.81 vs 20.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 10.03% net margin).
•PSIX grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.42% vs 5.10% CAGR).
•EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while PSIX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	PSIX
P/E ratio	20.17	15.81
Forward P/E	17.33	15.94
P/S ratio	2.90	1.59
P/B ratio	4.34	5.30
EV / EBITDA	12.23	11.91
FCF yield	6.10%	6.24%

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	PSIX
Gross margin	49.05%	23.73%
Operating margin	21.76%	13.00%
Net margin	14.72%	10.03%
ROE	22.01%	33.41%
ROIC	15.21%	21.64%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	PSIX
Dividend yield	0.11%	N/A
Payout ratio	2.26%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	PSIX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.10%	9.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%	53.38%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	34.85%	26.17%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.03%	54.05%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or PSIX?: PSIX has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 20.17 and PSIX at 15.81. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or PSIX?: Over the past five years, PSIX grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus PSIX at 9.42%.
Does EPAC or PSIX pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while PSIX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is EPAC or PSIX more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus PSIX at 10.03%.
How have EPAC and PSIX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 4.95% and PSIX delivered 13.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full PSIX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio Power Solutions International P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE Power Solutions International ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin Power Solutions International operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth Power Solutions International revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow Power Solutions International free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & Power Solutions International appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.