Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Jabil Inc. (JBL)
A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Jabil Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EPAC is classified in Industrials; JBL is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
JBL
Jabil Inc.
$302.95TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EPAC vs JBL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yEPAC +2967.5%JBL +30523.9%JBL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EPAC JBL
EPAC vs JBL: by the numbers
- •JBL is the larger company ($31.75B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •EPAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.71 vs 38.89 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.10% vs 2.86% CAGR).
- •EPAC pays the higher dividend yield (0.11% vs 0.10%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EPAC | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.71 | 38.89 |
| Forward P/E | 18.70 | 24.42 |
| P/S ratio | 2.84 | 0.99 |
| P/B ratio | 4.24 | 25.07 |
| PEG ratio | 2.78 | 0.51 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.97 | 16.62 |
| FCF yield | 6.24% | 4.53% |
Profitability
| Metric | EPAC | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.05% | 9.23% |
| Operating margin | 21.76% | 4.32% |
| Net margin | 14.72% | 2.57% |
| ROE | 22.01% | 65.15% |
| ROIC | 15.12% | 16.06% |
Dividends
| Metric | EPAC | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | 0.10% |
| Payout ratio | 2.33% | 5.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EPAC | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.10% | 2.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 169.53% | 75.55% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 34.85% | 59.60% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.62% | 40.96% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EPAC or JBL?
- EPAC has the lower trailing P/E: EPAC trades at 19.71 and JBL at 38.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EPAC or JBL?
- Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus JBL at 2.86%.
- Does EPAC or JBL pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC yields 0.11% and JBL yields 0.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EPAC or JBL more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus JBL at 2.57%.
- How have EPAC and JBL total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EPAC delivered 3.89% and JBL delivered 32.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Enerpac Tool P/E ratioJabil P/E ratioEnerpac Tool dividend yieldJabil dividend yieldEnerpac Tool ROEJabil ROEEnerpac Tool operating marginJabil operating marginEnerpac Tool revenue growthJabil revenue growthEnerpac Tool free cash flowJabil free cash flow
Enerpac Tool & Jabil appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.