Is DT or HUBS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, DT is cheaper: DT trades at a 75.70 P/E and HUBS at 98.51.

Which has grown faster, DT or HUBS?

Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — DT at a 23.47% CAGR versus HUBS at 27.85%.

Is DT or HUBS more profitable?

DT runs the higher net margin — DT at 8.06% versus HUBS at 3.04%.

Which has been the better investment, DT or HUBS?

Over the past 5-year, HUBS delivered the higher annualized total return — DT at -5.97% versus HUBS at 14.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) vs HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS)

DT leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. and HubSpot, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — DT vs HUBS

growth of $100 · last 7y

DT +70.9%HUBS +5.8%DT compounded faster

DT HUBS

DT vs HUBS: by the numbers

•DT is the larger company ($11.88B vs $9.63B market cap).
•DT trades at the lower earnings multiple (75.70 vs 98.51 P/E).
•DT converts more revenue to profit (8.06% vs 3.04% net margin).
•HUBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.85% vs 23.47% CAGR).

Which is better, DT or HUBS?

Metric tally: DT 8 · HUBS 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueDT(lower P/E)

GrowthHUBS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityDT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	DT	HUBS
P/E ratio	75.70●	98.51
P/S ratio	6.04	3.00●
P/B ratio	4.66●	4.95
PEG ratio	0.14●	0.52
EV / EBITDA	34.74	35.09
FCF yield	4.33%	7.21%●

Profitability

Metric	DT	HUBS
Gross margin	81.56%	83.65%●
Operating margin	13.08%●	1.95%
Net margin	8.06%●	3.04%
ROE	6.23%●	5.02%
ROIC	4.99%●	0.31%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DT	HUBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	23.47%	27.85%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.87%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.62%	57.18%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-5.97%●	-18.40%

Frequently asked

Which is better, DT or HUBS?: It depends on your goal. value: DT (lower P/E); growth: HUBS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: DT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, DT leads 8 to 5.
Is DT or HUBS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, DT is cheaper: DT trades at a 75.70 P/E and HUBS at 98.51.
Which has grown faster, DT or HUBS?: Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — DT at a 23.47% CAGR versus HUBS at 27.85%.
Is DT or HUBS more profitable?: DT runs the higher net margin — DT at 8.06% versus HUBS at 3.04%.
Which has been the better investment, DT or HUBS?: Over the past 5-year, HUBS delivered the higher annualized total return — DT at -5.97% versus HUBS at 14.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DT analysis Full HUBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Dynatrace P/E ratio HubSpot P/E ratio Dynatrace dividend yield HubSpot dividend yield Dynatrace ROE HubSpot ROE Dynatrace operating margin HubSpot operating margin Dynatrace revenue growth HubSpot revenue growth Dynatrace free cash flow HubSpot free cash flow

Dynatrace & HubSpot appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.