Carvana Co. (CVNA) vs Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT)
A side-by-side comparison of Carvana Co. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CVNA
Carvana Co.
$70.52Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 1:20 PM EDT
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
$310.41Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 1:19 PM EDT
Total return — CVNA vs HLT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9yCVNA +3015.3% (+46.5%/yr)HLT +427.1% (+20.3%/yr)CVNA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CVNA HLT
CVNA vs HLT: by the numbers
- •CVNA is the larger company ($77.35B vs $69.86B market cap).
- •CVNA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.68 vs 45.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •HLT converts more revenue to profit (12.69% vs 6.26% net margin).
- •HLT grew revenue faster over the past five years (25.41% vs 22.86% CAGR).
- •HLT pays a dividend (0.20% yield), while CVNA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CVNA | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.68 | 45.58 |
| Forward P/E | 43.55 | 34.34 |
| P/S ratio | 3.09 | 5.60 |
| P/B ratio | 19.20 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.02 | 26.67 |
| FCF yield | 1.20% | 2.85% |
Profitability
| Metric | CVNA | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 19.37% | 44.06% |
| Operating margin | 8.93% | 23.35% |
| Net margin | 6.26% | 12.69% |
| ROE | 38.93% | N/A |
| ROIC | 17.35% | 16.55% |
Dividends
| Metric | CVNA | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.20% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 8.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CVNA | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.86% | 25.41% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 12.36% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 40.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.96% | 19.49% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CVNA or HLT?
- CVNA has the lower trailing P/E: CVNA trades at 32.68 and HLT at 45.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CVNA or HLT?
- Over the past five years, HLT grew revenue faster — CVNA at a 22.86% CAGR versus HLT at 25.41%.
- Does CVNA or HLT pay a bigger dividend?
- HLT pays a dividend (0.20% yield), while CVNA has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CVNA or HLT more profitable?
- HLT runs the higher net margin — CVNA at 6.26% versus HLT at 12.69%.
- How have CVNA and HLT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CVNA delivered 0.96% and HLT delivered 19.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carvana P/E ratioHilton Worldwide P/E ratioHilton Worldwide dividend yieldCarvana ROEHilton Worldwide ROECarvana operating marginHilton Worldwide operating marginCarvana revenue growthHilton Worldwide revenue growthCarvana free cash flowHilton Worldwide free cash flow
Carvana & Hilton Worldwide appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.