Carvana Co. (CVNA) vs Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT)
HLT leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics, though CVNA is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Carvana Co. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CVNA
Carvana Co.
$68.90Consumer Cyclical
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
$347.11Consumer Cyclical
Total return — CVNA vs HLT
growth of $100 · last 9yCVNA +3003.6%HLT +488.6%CVNA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CVNA HLT
CVNA vs HLT: by the numbers
- •HLT is the larger company ($79.02B vs $75.57B market cap).
- •CVNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.55 vs 52.99 P/E).
- •HLT converts more revenue to profit (12.56% vs 7.09% net margin).
- •HLT grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.37% vs 27.32% CAGR).
- •HLT pays a dividend (0.17% yield) while CVNA does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CVNA or HLT?
Metric tally: CVNA 4 · HLT 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCVNA(lower P/E)
GrowthHLT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityHLT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CVNA | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.55● | 52.99 |
| Forward P/E | 33.14 | 33.45 |
| P/S ratio | 2.27● | 6.56 |
| P/B ratio | 13.71 | — |
| PEG ratio | 0.08● | 4.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 30.95 |
| FCF yield | 1.45% | 2.68%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CVNA | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 19.97% | 44.29%● |
| Operating margin | 9.19% | 23.08%● |
| Net margin | 7.09% | 12.56%● |
| ROE | 42.90%● | -27.04% |
| ROIC | -33.63% | 11.29%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CVNA | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.17% |
| Payout ratio | — | 9.71% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CVNA | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 27.32% | 30.37%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 12.36% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 45.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.75% | 22.17%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CVNA or HLT?
- It depends on your goal. value: CVNA (lower P/E); growth: HLT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: HLT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HLT leads 7 to 4.
- Is CVNA or HLT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CVNA is cheaper: CVNA trades at a 34.55 P/E and HLT at 52.99.
- Which has grown faster, CVNA or HLT?
- Over the past five years, HLT grew revenue faster — CVNA at a 27.32% CAGR versus HLT at 30.37%.
- Does CVNA or HLT pay a bigger dividend?
- HLT pays a dividend (0.17% yield) while CVNA does not currently pay one.
- Is CVNA or HLT more profitable?
- HLT runs the higher net margin — CVNA at 7.09% versus HLT at 12.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, CVNA or HLT?
- Over the past 5-year, HLT delivered the higher annualized total return — CVNA at 4.75% versus HLT at 23.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carvana P/E ratioHilton Worldwide P/E ratioCarvana dividend yieldHilton Worldwide dividend yieldCarvana ROEHilton Worldwide ROECarvana operating marginHilton Worldwide operating marginCarvana revenue growthHilton Worldwide revenue growthCarvana free cash flowHilton Worldwide free cash flow
Carvana & Hilton Worldwide appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.