CubeSmart (CUBE) vs Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN)

A side-by-side comparison of CubeSmart and Opendoor Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCUBE vs OPEN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
CUBE +85.0% (+10.8%/yr)OPEN -74.1% (-20.2%/yr)CUBE compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
1101001kStart $100202120222023202420252026$185$26
CUBE OPEN

CUBE vs OPEN: by the numbers

  • CUBE is the larger company ($8.95B vs $2.69B market cap).
  • CUBE is profitable (29.41% net margin) while OPEN runs a net loss (-46.74%).
  • CUBE grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.94% vs 5.24% CAGR).
  • CUBE pays a dividend (5.40% yield), while OPEN has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCUBEOPEN
P/E ratio27.27N/A
Forward P/E25.65N/A
P/S ratio7.880.83
P/B ratio3.472.94
EV / EBITDA17.73N/A
FCF yield5.95%N/A

For REITs like CubeSmart, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

For REITs like Opendoor Technologies Inc., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricCUBEOPEN
Gross margin17.42%8.30%
Operating margin39.85%-6.25%
Net margin29.41%-46.74%
ROE12.95%-166.41%
ROIC6.88%-26.19%

Dividends

MetricCUBEOPEN
Dividend yield5.40%N/A
Payout ratio145.52%N/A

CubeSmart's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Opendoor Technologies Inc.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricCUBEOPEN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)8.94%5.24%
EPS CAGR (5Y)11.43%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)8.16%9.49%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-1.72%-31.64%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CUBE or OPEN?
Over the past five years, CUBE grew revenue faster — CUBE at a 8.94% CAGR versus OPEN at 5.24%.
Does CUBE or OPEN pay a bigger dividend?
CUBE pays a dividend (5.40% yield), while OPEN has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CUBE or OPEN more profitable?
CUBE runs the higher net margin — CUBE at 29.41% versus OPEN at -46.74%.
How have CUBE and OPEN total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, CUBE delivered -1.72% and OPEN delivered -31.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.