Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSWC or UFCS?

UFCS has the lower trailing P/E: CSWC trades at 13.08 and UFCS at 10.20. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CSWC or UFCS?

Over the past five years, CSWC grew revenue faster — CSWC at a 18.61% CAGR versus UFCS at 5.12%.

Does CSWC or UFCS pay a bigger dividend?

CSWC yields 10.86% and UFCS yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CSWC or UFCS more profitable?

CSWC runs the higher net margin — CSWC at 48.19% versus UFCS at 9.57%.

How have CSWC and UFCS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CSWC delivered 17.43% and UFCS delivered 5.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) vs United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS)

A side-by-side comparison of Capital Southwest Corporation and United Fire Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CSWC

Capital Southwest Corporation

$1.47B

$23.67Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

UFCS

United Fire Group, Inc.

$1.41B

$54.87Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CSWC vs UFCS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CSWC +403.1% (+17.5%/yr)UFCS +68.3% (+5.3%/yr)CSWC compounded faster over this window

CSWC UFCS

CSWC vs UFCS: by the numbers

•CSWC is the larger company ($1.47B vs $1.41B market cap).
•UFCS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.20 vs 13.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CSWC converts more revenue to profit (48.19% vs 9.57% net margin).
•CSWC grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.61% vs 5.12% CAGR).
•CSWC pays the higher dividend yield (10.86% vs 1.39%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CSWC	UFCS
P/E ratio	13.08	10.20
Forward P/E	10.22	11.02
P/S ratio	6.40	0.96
P/B ratio	1.39	1.44

Profitability

Metric	CSWC	UFCS
Gross margin	94.33%	N/A
Operating margin	76.87%	12.01%
Net margin	48.19%	9.57%
ROE	10.46%	14.42%

United Fire Group, Inc.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	CSWC	UFCS
Dividend yield	10.86%	1.39%
Payout ratio	141.48%	14.13%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CSWC	UFCS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.61%	5.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-5.81%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.79%	21.47%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSWC or UFCS?: UFCS has the lower trailing P/E: CSWC trades at 13.08 and UFCS at 10.20. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CSWC or UFCS?: Over the past five years, CSWC grew revenue faster — CSWC at a 18.61% CAGR versus UFCS at 5.12%.
Does CSWC or UFCS pay a bigger dividend?: CSWC yields 10.86% and UFCS yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CSWC or UFCS more profitable?: CSWC runs the higher net margin — CSWC at 48.19% versus UFCS at 9.57%.
How have CSWC and UFCS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CSWC delivered 17.43% and UFCS delivered 5.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CSWC analysis Full UFCS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Capital Southwest P/E ratio United Fire P/E ratio Capital Southwest dividend yield United Fire dividend yield Capital Southwest ROE United Fire ROE Capital Southwest operating margin United Fire operating margin Capital Southwest revenue growth United Fire revenue growth

Capital Southwest & United Fire appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.