CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) vs Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT)
A side-by-side comparison of CoStar Group, Inc. and Federal Realty Investment Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — CSGP vs FRT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCSGP vs FRT: by the numbers
- •CSGP is the larger company ($11.66B vs $9.54B market cap).
- •FRT converts more revenue to profit (32.66% vs 2.08% net margin).
- •CSGP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.49% vs 8.77% CAGR).
- •FRT pays a dividend (3.95% yield), while CSGP has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CSGP | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 156.70 | 22.00 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 25.92 |
| P/S ratio | 3.28 | 7.14 |
| P/B ratio | 1.47 | 2.84 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.11 | N/A |
| FCF yield | N/A | 3.28% |
For REITs like CoStar Group, Inc., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Federal Realty Investment Trust, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | CSGP | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 76.48% | 9.73% |
| Operating margin | 2.18% | 34.49% |
| Net margin | 2.08% | 32.66% |
| ROE | 0.93% | 12.96% |
| ROIC | 0.60% | 5.08% |
Dividends
| Metric | CSGP | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.95% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 90.04% |
CoStar Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Federal Realty Investment Trust's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CSGP | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.49% | 8.77% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -51.09% | 24.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -5.28% | 69.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -19.50% | 3.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, CSGP or FRT?
- Over the past five years, CSGP grew revenue faster — CSGP at a 14.49% CAGR versus FRT at 8.77%.
- Does CSGP or FRT pay a bigger dividend?
- FRT pays a dividend (3.95% yield), while CSGP has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CSGP or FRT more profitable?
- FRT runs the higher net margin — CSGP at 2.08% versus FRT at 32.66%.
- How have CSGP and FRT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CSGP delivered 4.00% and FRT delivered 0.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CoStar & Federal Realty Investment appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.