Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or WFC?

WFC has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 42.13 and WFC at 13.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CRS or WFC?

Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.

Does CRS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

CRS yields 0.18% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CRS or WFC more profitable?

WFC runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus WFC at 17.54%.

How have CRS and WFC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 30.92% and WFC delivered 9.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CRS is classified in Basic Materials; WFC is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CRS

Carpenter Technology Corporation

$22.02B

$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WFC

Wells Fargo & Company

$272.95B

$90.26Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — CRS vs WFC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CRS +1327.3% (+30.5%/yr)WFC +156.6% (+9.9%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CRS WFC

CRS vs WFC: by the numbers

•WFC is the larger company ($272.95B vs $22.02B market cap).
•WFC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.02 vs 42.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WFC converts more revenue to profit (17.54% vs 16.96% net margin).
•CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.19% vs 9.78% CAGR).
•WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRS	WFC
P/E ratio	42.13	13.02
Forward P/E	33.23	12.38
P/S ratio	7.05	2.11
P/B ratio	9.89	1.51
EV / EBITDA	26.28	N/A
FCF yield	1.65%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CRS	WFC
Gross margin	30.58%	64.50%
Operating margin	22.47%	21.17%
Net margin	16.96%	17.54%
ROE	23.78%	12.57%
ROIC	17.08%	N/A

Dividends

Metric	CRS	WFC
Dividend yield	0.18%	2.06%
Payout ratio	7.60%	26.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRS	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.19%	9.78%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	178.15%	72.38%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.37%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	71.94%	17.97%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or WFC?: WFC has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 42.13 and WFC at 13.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CRS or WFC?: Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus WFC at 9.78%.
Does CRS or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: CRS yields 0.18% and WFC yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CRS or WFC more profitable?: WFC runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus WFC at 17.54%.
How have CRS and WFC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 30.92% and WFC delivered 9.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRS analysis Full WFC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carpenter Technology P/E ratio Wells Fargo P/E ratio Carpenter Technology dividend yield Wells Fargo dividend yield Carpenter Technology ROE Wells Fargo ROE Carpenter Technology operating margin Wells Fargo operating margin Carpenter Technology revenue growth Wells Fargo revenue growth Carpenter Technology free cash flow

Carpenter Technology & Wells Fargo appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.