Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Regency Centers Corporation (REG)

A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Regency Centers Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: CRS is classified in Basic Materials; REG is classified in Real Estate. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCRS vs REG

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
CRS +1327.3% (+30.5%/yr)REG +44.3% (+3.7%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $10020182020202220242026$1,427$144
CRS REG

CRS vs REG: by the numbers

  • CRS is the larger company ($22.02B vs $13.63B market cap).
  • REG converts more revenue to profit (38.24% vs 16.96% net margin).
  • CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.19% vs 9.52% CAGR).
  • REG pays the higher dividend yield (3.94% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCRSREG
P/E ratio42.1321.14
Forward P/E33.2329.79
P/S ratio7.057.91
P/B ratio9.891.98
EV / EBITDA26.2816.92
FCF yield1.65%3.79%

For REITs like Regency Centers Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricCRSREG
Gross margin30.58%44.66%
Operating margin22.47%40.33%
Net margin16.96%38.24%
ROE23.78%9.58%
ROIC17.08%5.29%

Dividends

MetricCRSREG
Dividend yield0.18%3.94%
Payout ratio7.60%84.14%

Regency Centers Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricCRSREG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)16.19%9.52%
EPS CAGR (5Y)178.15%61.10%
FCF CAGR (5Y)19.37%-3.16%
Total return CAGR (5Y)71.94%6.11%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CRS or REG?
Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus REG at 9.52%.
Does CRS or REG pay a bigger dividend?
CRS yields 0.18% and REG yields 3.94% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CRS or REG more profitable?
REG runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus REG at 38.24%.
How have CRS and REG total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 30.92% and REG delivered 3.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.