Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CRS is classified in Basic Materials; NVDA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$218.29TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRS vs NVDA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCRS +1295.2% (+30.2%/yr)NVDA +14538.6% (+64.6%/yr)NVDA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS NVDA
CRS vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($5.29T vs $22.02B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.60 vs 42.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (63.66% vs 16.96% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.34% vs 16.19% CAGR).
- •CRS pays the higher dividend yield (0.18% vs 0.13%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 42.13 | 27.60 |
| Forward P/E | 33.23 | 23.59 |
| P/S ratio | 7.05 | 17.45 |
| P/B ratio | 9.89 | 23.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.28 | 26.35 |
| FCF yield | 1.65% | 2.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.58% | 74.67% |
| Operating margin | 22.47% | 65.21% |
| Net margin | 16.96% | 63.66% |
| ROE | 23.78% | 84.23% |
| ROIC | 17.08% | 59.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 0.13% |
| Payout ratio | 7.60% | 3.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.19% | 69.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 178.15% | 94.31% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | 82.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 71.94% | 57.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or NVDA?
- NVDA has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 42.13 and NVDA at 27.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus NVDA at 69.34%.
- Does CRS or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.18% and NVDA yields 0.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus NVDA at 63.66%.
- How have CRS and NVDA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 30.92% and NVDA delivered 64.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROENVIDIA ROECarpenter Technology operating marginNVIDIA operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.