Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CRS is classified in Basic Materials; NVDA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$560.43Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$197.02TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRS vs NVDA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCRS +6092.0%NVDA +522434.1%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS NVDA
CRS vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.77T vs $27.85B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.09 vs 61.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 15.82% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 15.23% CAGR).
- •CRS pays the higher dividend yield (0.14% vs 0.02%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 61.08 | 30.09 |
| Forward P/E | 54.81 | 41.87 |
| P/S ratio | 9.64 | 18.91 |
| P/B ratio | 14.12 | 24.52 |
| PEG ratio | 0.37 | 0.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.42 | 28.96 |
| FCF yield | 1.40% | 2.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73% | 74.15% |
| Operating margin | 21.34% | 64.02% |
| Net margin | 15.82% | 62.97% |
| ROE | 23.17% | 81.65% |
| ROIC | 13.94% | 62.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.02% |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23% | 68.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42% | 85.78% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57% | 85.52% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 74.76% | 59.29% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or NVDA?
- NVDA has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 61.08 and NVDA at 30.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does CRS or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.14% and NVDA yields 0.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- How have CRS and NVDA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 33.06% and NVDA delivered 64.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROENVIDIA ROECarpenter Technology operating marginNVIDIA operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.