Is CLS or TWLO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 37.12 P/E and TWLO at 323.09.

Which has grown faster, CLS or TWLO?

Over the past five years, TWLO grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus TWLO at 21.69%.

Is CLS or TWLO more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus TWLO at 1.96%.

Which has been the better investment, CLS or TWLO?

Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 40.76% versus TWLO at 17.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Twilio Inc. (TWLO)

CLS leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Twilio Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$35.34B

$307.34TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TWLO

Twilio Inc.

$31.15B

$205.24TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs TWLO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2869.5%TWLO +628.6%CLS compounded faster

CLS TWLO

CLS vs TWLO: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($35.34B vs $31.15B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower earnings multiple (37.12 vs 323.09 P/E).
•CLS converts more revenue to profit (6.95% vs 1.96% net margin).
•TWLO grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.69% vs 19.51% CAGR).

Which is better, CLS or TWLO?

Metric tally: CLS 8 · TWLO 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCLS(lower P/E)

GrowthTWLO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	TWLO
P/E ratio	37.12●	323.09
Forward P/E	30.45	—
P/S ratio	2.57●	6.15
P/B ratio	17.36	4.19●
PEG ratio	0.39	—
EV / EBITDA	28.51●	75.45
FCF yield	1.39%	3.03%●

Profitability

Metric	CLS	TWLO
Gross margin	11.61%	48.69%●
Operating margin	7.84%●	4.89%
Net margin	6.95%●	1.96%
ROE	46.86%●	1.34%
ROIC	27.74%●	1.20%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	TWLO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.51%	21.69%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.52%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	111.48%●	-11.68%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CLS or TWLO?: It depends on your goal. value: CLS (lower P/E); growth: TWLO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CLS leads 8 to 4.
Is CLS or TWLO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 37.12 P/E and TWLO at 323.09.
Which has grown faster, CLS or TWLO?: Over the past five years, TWLO grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus TWLO at 21.69%.
Is CLS or TWLO more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus TWLO at 1.96%.
Which has been the better investment, CLS or TWLO?: Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 40.76% versus TWLO at 17.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full TWLO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Twilio P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Twilio dividend yield Celestica ROE Twilio ROE Celestica operating margin Twilio operating margin Celestica revenue growth Twilio revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Twilio free cash flow

Celestica & Twilio appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.