Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or PSIX?

PSIX has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and PSIX at 14.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or PSIX?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus PSIX at 9.42%.

Is CLS or PSIX more profitable?

PSIX runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus PSIX at 10.03%.

How have CLS and PSIX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and PSIX delivered 13.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Power Solutions International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; PSIX is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PSIX

Power Solutions International, Inc.

$971M

$42.11IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs PSIX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2732.2% (+39.7%/yr)PSIX +260.0% (+13.7%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CLS PSIX

CLS vs PSIX: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $971M market cap).
•PSIX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.27 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PSIX converts more revenue to profit (10.03% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 9.42% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	PSIX
P/E ratio	35.99	14.27
Forward P/E	30.38	14.39
P/S ratio	2.55	1.44
P/B ratio	16.07	4.78
EV / EBITDA	27.75	10.81
FCF yield	1.30%	6.91%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	PSIX
Gross margin	11.59%	23.73%
Operating margin	8.13%	13.00%
Net margin	7.16%	10.03%
ROE	45.07%	33.41%
ROIC	29.75%	21.64%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	PSIX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	9.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	53.38%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	26.17%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	106.10%	53.75%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or PSIX?: PSIX has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and PSIX at 14.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or PSIX?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus PSIX at 9.42%.
Is CLS or PSIX more profitable?: PSIX runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus PSIX at 10.03%.
How have CLS and PSIX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and PSIX delivered 13.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full PSIX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Power Solutions International P/E ratio Celestica ROE Power Solutions International ROE Celestica operating margin Power Solutions International operating margin Celestica revenue growth Power Solutions International revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Power Solutions International free cash flow

Celestica & Power Solutions International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.