Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or JBL?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.25 and JBL at 44.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or JBL?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus JBL at 2.86%.

Does CLS or JBL pay a bigger dividend?

JBL pays a dividend (0.09% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or JBL more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus JBL at 2.57%.

How have CLS and JBL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.92% and JBL delivered 33.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Jabil Inc. (JBL)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Jabil Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.03B

$339.46TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

JBL

Jabil Inc.

$38.37B

$366.16TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs JBL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLS +2913.1% (+40.6%/yr)JBL +1755.5% (+33.9%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

CLS JBL

CLS vs JBL: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($39.03B vs $38.37B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.25 vs 44.52 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 2.57% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 2.86% CAGR).
•JBL pays a dividend (0.09% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	JBL
P/E ratio	35.25	44.52
Forward P/E	29.85	27.96
P/S ratio	2.53	1.13
P/B ratio	15.91	28.71
EV / EBITDA	27.47	18.85
FCF yield	1.32%	3.96%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	JBL
Gross margin	11.59%	9.23%
Operating margin	8.13%	4.32%
Net margin	7.16%	2.57%
ROE	45.07%	65.15%
ROIC	27.74%	16.06%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	JBL
Dividend yield	N/A	0.09%
Payout ratio	N/A	5.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	JBL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	2.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	75.55%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	59.60%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	107.68%	43.12%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or JBL?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.25 and JBL at 44.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or JBL?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus JBL at 2.86%.
Does CLS or JBL pay a bigger dividend?: JBL pays a dividend (0.09% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or JBL more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus JBL at 2.57%.
How have CLS and JBL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.92% and JBL delivered 33.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full JBL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Jabil P/E ratio Jabil dividend yield Celestica ROE Jabil ROE Celestica operating margin Jabil operating margin Celestica revenue growth Jabil revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Jabil free cash flow

Celestica & Jabil appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.