Is CLS or JBL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 40.76 P/E and JBL at 44.77.

Which has grown faster, CLS or JBL?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus JBL at 2.86%.

Does CLS or JBL pay a bigger dividend?

JBL pays a dividend (0.09% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.

Is CLS or JBL more profitable?

CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus JBL at 2.57%.

Which has been the better investment, CLS or JBL?

Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 42.55% versus JBL at 35.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Jabil Inc. (JBL)

CLS leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Jabil Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CLS vs JBL

growth of $100 · last 28y

CLS +3500.3%JBL +4236.2%JBL compounded faster

CLS JBL

CLS vs JBL: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($38.81B vs $37.79B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.76 vs 44.77 P/E).
•CLS converts more revenue to profit (6.95% vs 2.57% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 2.86% CAGR).
•JBL pays a dividend (0.09% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CLS or JBL?

Metric tally: CLS 9 · JBL 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCLS(lower P/E)

GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	JBL
P/E ratio	40.76●	44.77
Forward P/E	34.01	28.11●
P/S ratio	2.83	1.14●
P/B ratio	19.07●	28.87
PEG ratio	0.39●	0.59
EV / EBITDA	31.28	20.85●
FCF yield	1.26%	3.94%●

Profitability

Metric	CLS	JBL
Gross margin	11.61%●	9.23%
Operating margin	7.84%●	4.32%
Net margin	6.95%●	2.57%
ROE	46.86%	65.15%●
ROIC	27.74%●	16.06%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	JBL
Dividend yield	—	0.09%
Payout ratio	—	5.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	JBL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	19.51%●	2.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	75.55%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.52%	59.60%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	110.78%●	44.67%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CLS or JBL?: It depends on your goal. value: CLS (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CLS leads 9 to 7.
Is CLS or JBL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 40.76 P/E and JBL at 44.77.
Which has grown faster, CLS or JBL?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus JBL at 2.86%.
Does CLS or JBL pay a bigger dividend?: JBL pays a dividend (0.09% yield) while CLS does not currently pay one.
Is CLS or JBL more profitable?: CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus JBL at 2.57%.
Which has been the better investment, CLS or JBL?: Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 42.55% versus JBL at 35.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full JBL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Jabil P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Jabil dividend yield Celestica ROE Jabil ROE Celestica operating margin Jabil operating margin Celestica revenue growth Jabil revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Jabil free cash flow

Celestica & Jabil appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.