Which has the lower trailing P/E, CINF or PH?

CINF has the lower trailing P/E: CINF trades at 8.10 and PH at 32.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CINF or PH?

Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — CINF at a 8.12% CAGR versus PH at 8.43%.

Does CINF or PH pay a bigger dividend?

CINF yields 2.13% and PH yields 0.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CINF or PH more profitable?

CINF runs the higher net margin — CINF at 23.84% versus PH at 16.97%.

How have CINF and PH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CINF delivered 11.33% and PH delivered 24.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

A side-by-side comparison of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CINF is classified in Financial Services; PH is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CINF

Cincinnati Financial Corporation

$26.38B

$171.90Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$116.83B

$926.58IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT

Total return — CINF vs PH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CINF +185.3% (+11.1%/yr)PH +807.2% (+24.7%/yr)PH compounded faster over this window

CINF PH

CINF vs PH: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($116.83B vs $26.38B market cap).
•CINF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.10 vs 32.52 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CINF converts more revenue to profit (23.84% vs 16.97% net margin).
•PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.43% vs 8.12% CAGR).
•CINF pays the higher dividend yield (2.13% vs 0.80%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CINF	PH
P/E ratio	8.10	32.52
Forward P/E	20.54	26.38
P/S ratio	1.89	5.43
P/B ratio	1.58	7.58
EV / EBITDA	N/A	22.81
FCF yield	N/A	3.34%

Profitability

Metric	CINF	PH
Gross margin	52.29%	37.69%
Operating margin	29.78%	21.55%
Net margin	23.84%	16.97%
ROE	19.96%	23.68%
ROIC	N/A	13.94%

Dividends

Metric	CINF	PH
Dividend yield	2.13%	0.80%
Payout ratio	17.07%	26.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CINF	PH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.12%	8.43%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.01%	16.37%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	10.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.35%	28.92%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CINF or PH?: CINF has the lower trailing P/E: CINF trades at 8.10 and PH at 32.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CINF or PH?: Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — CINF at a 8.12% CAGR versus PH at 8.43%.
Does CINF or PH pay a bigger dividend?: CINF yields 2.13% and PH yields 0.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CINF or PH more profitable?: CINF runs the higher net margin — CINF at 23.84% versus PH at 16.97%.
How have CINF and PH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CINF delivered 11.33% and PH delivered 24.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CINF analysis Full PH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cincinnati Financial P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Cincinnati Financial dividend yield Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Cincinnati Financial ROE Parker-Hannifin ROE Cincinnati Financial operating margin Parker-Hannifin operating margin Cincinnati Financial revenue growth Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Parker-Hannifin free cash flow

Cincinnati Financial & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.