Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) vs M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)
MTB leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics, though CINF is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and M&T Bank Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
$178.45Financial Services
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
$233.26Financial Services
Total return — CINF vs MTB
growth of $100 · last 30yCINF +904.8%MTB +852.1%CINF compounded faster
CINF MTB
CINF vs MTB: by the numbers
- •MTB is the larger company ($34.16B vs $27.60B market cap).
- •CINF trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.20 vs 12.98 P/E).
- •MTB converts more revenue to profit (23.71% vs 21.34% net margin).
- •MTB grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.97% vs 5.55% CAGR).
- •MTB pays the higher dividend yield (2.57% vs 2.03%).
Which is better, CINF or MTB?
Metric tally: CINF 5 · MTB 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCINF(lower P/E)
GrowthMTB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMTB(higher dividend yield)
QualityCINF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CINF | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.20● | 12.98 |
| Forward P/E | 20.55 | 12.48● |
| P/S ratio | 2.16● | 2.95 |
| P/B ratio | 1.78 | 1.31● |
| PEG ratio | 3.03 | 0.73● |
Profitability
| Metric | CINF | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.29% | 75.31%● |
| Operating margin | 26.68% | 30.69%● |
| Net margin | 21.34% | 23.71%● |
| ROE | 17.54%● | 10.48% |
| ROIC | 10.68%● | 6.75% |
Dividends
| Metric | CINF | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 2.57%● |
| Payout ratio | 23.86% | 35.09% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CINF | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.55% | 14.97%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.01%● | 11.46% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.39% | 13.08%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CINF or MTB?
- It depends on your goal. value: CINF (lower P/E); growth: MTB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MTB (higher dividend yield); quality: CINF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MTB leads 9 to 5.
- Is CINF or MTB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CINF is cheaper: CINF trades at a 10.20 P/E and MTB at 12.98.
- Which has grown faster, CINF or MTB?
- Over the past five years, MTB grew revenue faster — CINF at a 5.55% CAGR versus MTB at 14.97%.
- Does CINF or MTB pay a bigger dividend?
- CINF yields 2.03% and MTB yields 2.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CINF or MTB more profitable?
- MTB runs the higher net margin — CINF at 21.34% versus MTB at 23.71%.
- Which has been the better investment, CINF or MTB?
- Over the past 10-year, CINF delivered the higher annualized total return — CINF at 12.71% versus MTB at 10.67%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cincinnati Financial P/E ratioM&T Bank P/E ratioCincinnati Financial dividend yieldM&T Bank dividend yieldCincinnati Financial ROEM&T Bank ROECincinnati Financial operating marginM&T Bank operating marginCincinnati Financial revenue growthM&T Bank revenue growthCincinnati Financial free cash flowM&T Bank free cash flow
Cincinnati Financial & M&T Bank appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.