Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) vs Loews Corporation (L)
CINF leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Loews Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
$169.01Financial Services
L
Loews Corporation
$108.12Financial Services
Total return — CINF vs L
growth of $100 · last 30yCINF +837.4%L +733.0%CINF compounded faster
CINF L
CINF vs L: by the numbers
- •CINF is the larger company ($26.14B vs $22.25B market cap).
- •CINF trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.66 vs 13.77 P/E).
- •CINF converts more revenue to profit (21.34% vs 10.22% net margin).
- •CINF grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.55% vs 5.43% CAGR).
- •CINF pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 0.23%).
Which is better, CINF or L?
Metric tally: CINF 8 · L 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCINF(lower P/E)
GrowthCINF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCINF(higher dividend yield)
QualityCINF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CINF | L |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.66● | 13.77 |
| Forward P/E | 19.47 | — |
| P/S ratio | 2.05 | 1.22● |
| P/B ratio | 1.68 | 1.19● |
| PEG ratio | 3.03 | 0.55● |
Profitability
| Metric | CINF | L |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.29%● | 46.05% |
| Operating margin | 26.68%● | 12.62% |
| Net margin | 21.34%● | 10.22% |
| ROE | 17.54%● | 9.99% |
| ROIC | 10.68%● | 3.76% |
Dividends
| Metric | CINF | L |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.10%● | 0.23% |
| Payout ratio | 23.40% | 3.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CINF | L |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.55%● | 5.43% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.01% | 17.17%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.43% | 14.35%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CINF or L?
- It depends on your goal. value: CINF (lower P/E); growth: CINF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CINF (higher dividend yield); quality: CINF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CINF leads 8 to 5.
- Is CINF or L cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CINF is cheaper: CINF trades at a 9.66 P/E and L at 13.77.
- Which has grown faster, CINF or L?
- Over the past five years, CINF grew revenue faster — CINF at a 5.55% CAGR versus L at 5.43%.
- Does CINF or L pay a bigger dividend?
- CINF yields 2.10% and L yields 0.23% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CINF or L more profitable?
- CINF runs the higher net margin — CINF at 21.34% versus L at 10.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, CINF or L?
- Over the past 10-year, CINF delivered the higher annualized total return — CINF at 12.06% versus L at 11.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cincinnati Financial P/E ratioLoews P/E ratioCincinnati Financial dividend yieldLoews dividend yieldCincinnati Financial ROELoews ROECincinnati Financial operating marginLoews operating marginCincinnati Financial revenue growthLoews revenue growthCincinnati Financial free cash flowLoews free cash flow
Cincinnati Financial & Loews appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.