CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) vs Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK)

A side-by-side comparison of CB Financial Services, Inc. and Landmark Bancorp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CBFV vs LARK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
CBFV +134.4% (+8.9%/yr)LARK +154.8% (+9.8%/yr)LARK compounded faster over this window
100150200250Start $10020182020202220242026$234$255
CBFV LARK

CBFV vs LARK: by the numbers

  • •LARK is the larger company ($189M vs $188M market cap).
  • •LARK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.33 vs 29.02 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •LARK converts more revenue to profit (25.55% vs 9.91% net margin).
  • •CBFV grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.68% vs 3.03% CAGR).
  • •CBFV pays the higher dividend yield (2.97% vs 2.66%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCBFVLARK
P/E ratio29.029.33
Forward P/E11.738.92
P/S ratio2.592.40
P/B ratio1.161.13

Profitability

MetricCBFVLARK
Operating margin10.89%24.02%
Net margin9.91%25.55%
ROE4.45%12.06%

CB Financial Services, Inc.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Landmark Bancorp, Inc.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

MetricCBFVLARK
Dividend yield2.97%2.66%
Payout ratio85.94%25.00%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCBFVLARK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)6.68%3.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A-1.72%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.17%10.28%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CBFV or LARK?
LARK has the lower trailing P/E: CBFV trades at 29.02 and LARK at 9.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CBFV or LARK?
Over the past five years, CBFV grew revenue faster — CBFV at a 6.68% CAGR versus LARK at 3.03%.
Does CBFV or LARK pay a bigger dividend?
CBFV yields 2.97% and LARK yields 2.66% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CBFV or LARK more profitable?
LARK runs the higher net margin — CBFV at 9.91% versus LARK at 25.55%.
How have CBFV and LARK total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CBFV delivered 8.77% and LARK delivered 9.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.