Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)
WFC leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BRK.A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$733370.00Financial Services
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$83.74Financial Services
Total return — BRK.A vs WFC
growth of $100 · last 30yBRK.A +2115.6%WFC +867.0%BRK.A compounded faster
BRK.A WFC
BRK.A vs WFC: by the numbers
- •BRK.A is the larger company ($1.05T vs $256.26B market cap).
- •WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.82 vs 14.55 P/E).
- •BRK.A converts more revenue to profit (19.31% vs 17.29% net margin).
- •WFC grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.46% vs 8.57% CAGR).
- •WFC pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while BRK.A does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BRK.A or WFC?
Metric tally: BRK.A 6 · WFC 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWFC(lower P/E)
GrowthWFC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBRK.A(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BRK.A | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.55 | 12.82● |
| Forward P/E | 23.59 | 11.96● |
| P/S ratio | 2.81 | 2.14● |
| P/B ratio | 1.45● | 1.51 |
| PEG ratio | 1.23 | 0.79● |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.83● | 17.27 |
| FCF yield | 2.26%● | 0.44% |
Profitability
| Metric | BRK.A | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.93% | 64.55%● |
| Operating margin | 15.28% | 20.47%● |
| Net margin | 19.31%● | 17.29% |
| ROE | 9.97% | 12.18%● |
| ROIC | 4.12%● | 3.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | BRK.A | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.15% |
| Payout ratio | — | 28.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BRK.A | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.57% | 9.46%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.79% | 72.38%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -4.29%● | -10.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.25% | 15.64%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BRK.A or WFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: WFC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BRK.A (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFC leads 10 to 6.
- Is BRK.A or WFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: BRK.A trades at a 14.55 P/E and WFC at 12.82.
- Which has grown faster, BRK.A or WFC?
- Over the past five years, WFC grew revenue faster — BRK.A at a 8.57% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
- Does BRK.A or WFC pay a bigger dividend?
- WFC pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while BRK.A does not currently pay one.
- Is BRK.A or WFC more profitable?
- BRK.A runs the higher net margin — BRK.A at 19.31% versus WFC at 17.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, BRK.A or WFC?
- Over the past 10-year, BRK.A delivered the higher annualized total return — BRK.A at 13.17% versus WFC at 8.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Berkshire Hathaway P/E ratioWells Fargo & P/E ratioBerkshire Hathaway dividend yieldWells Fargo & dividend yieldBerkshire Hathaway ROEWells Fargo & ROEBerkshire Hathaway operating marginWells Fargo & operating marginBerkshire Hathaway revenue growthWells Fargo & revenue growthBerkshire Hathaway free cash flowWells Fargo & free cash flow
Berkshire Hathaway & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.