Which has grown faster, BRK.A or LU?

Over the past five years, BRK.A grew revenue faster — BRK.A at a 8.57% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.

Is BRK.A or LU more profitable?

BRK.A runs the higher net margin — BRK.A at 19.31% versus LU at -10.59%.

Which has been the better investment, BRK.A or LU?

Over the past 5-year, BRK.A delivered the higher annualized total return — BRK.A at 13.17% versus LU at -40.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A) vs Lufax Holding Ltd (LU)

BRK.A leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Lufax Holding Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BRK.A

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

$1.05T

$733370.00Financial Services

Lufax Holding Ltd

$558M

$1.33Financial Services

Total return — BRK.A vs LU

growth of $100 · last 6y

BRK.A +142.4%LU -97.4%BRK.A compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BRK.A LU

BRK.A vs LU: by the numbers

•BRK.A is the larger company ($1.05T vs $558M market cap).
•BRK.A is profitable (19.31% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-10.59%).
•BRK.A grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.57% vs -6.44% CAGR).

Which is better, BRK.A or LU?

Metric tally: BRK.A 8 · LU 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBRK.A(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityBRK.A(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	BRK.A	LU
P/E ratio	14.55	—
Forward P/E	23.59	—
P/S ratio	2.81	0.09●
P/B ratio	1.45	0.05●
PEG ratio	1.23	—
EV / EBITDA	15.83●	72.98
FCF yield	2.26%	312.50%●

Profitability

Metric	BRK.A	LU
Gross margin	23.93%	41.96%●
Operating margin	15.28%●	-4.31%
Net margin	19.31%●	-10.59%
ROE	9.97%●	-4.14%
ROIC	4.12%●	-0.21%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BRK.A	LU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.57%●	-6.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.79%●	-43.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-4.29%	24.09%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.25%●	-40.92%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BRK.A or LU?: It depends on your goal. growth: BRK.A (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BRK.A (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BRK.A leads 8 to 5.
Which has grown faster, BRK.A or LU?: Over the past five years, BRK.A grew revenue faster — BRK.A at a 8.57% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.
Is BRK.A or LU more profitable?: BRK.A runs the higher net margin — BRK.A at 19.31% versus LU at -10.59%.
Which has been the better investment, BRK.A or LU?: Over the past 5-year, BRK.A delivered the higher annualized total return — BRK.A at 13.17% versus LU at -40.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BRK.A analysis Full LU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Berkshire Hathaway P/E ratio Lufax P/E ratio Berkshire Hathaway dividend yield Lufax dividend yield Berkshire Hathaway ROE Lufax ROE Berkshire Hathaway operating margin Lufax operating margin Berkshire Hathaway revenue growth Lufax revenue growth Berkshire Hathaway free cash flow Lufax free cash flow

Berkshire Hathaway & Lufax appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.