Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: BKNG is classified in Consumer Cyclical; UHS is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$199.31Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$166.22HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BKNG vs UHS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27yBKNG +1006.6%UHS +1671.2%UHS compounded faster
BKNG UHS
BKNG vs UHS: by the numbers
- •BKNG is the larger company ($154.44B vs $10.06B market cap).
- •UHS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.69 vs 24.63 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BKNG converts more revenue to profit (22.23% vs 8.56% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.43% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •BKNG pays the higher dividend yield (0.86% vs 0.50%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.63 | 6.69 |
| Forward P/E | 17.87 | 6.79 |
| P/S ratio | 5.36 | 0.55 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 1.31 |
| PEG ratio | 0.16 | 0.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.82 | 5.56 |
| FCF yield | 6.09% | 9.09% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00% | 90.45% |
| Operating margin | 34.28% | 11.50% |
| Net margin | 22.23% | 8.56% |
| ROE | -96.88% | 20.19% |
| ROIC | 50.82% | 11.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.50% |
| Payout ratio | 24.14% | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.43% | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62% | 16.19% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 39.83% | -4.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.66% | 0.55% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKNG or UHS?
- UHS has the lower trailing P/E: BKNG trades at 24.63 and UHS at 6.69. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or UHS?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 37.43% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
- Does BKNG or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG yields 0.86% and UHS yields 0.50% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKNG or UHS more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 22.23% versus UHS at 8.56%.
- How have BKNG and UHS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BKNG delivered 14.24% and UHS delivered 2.45% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldBooking ROEUniversal Health Services ROEBooking operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginBooking revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthBooking free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Booking & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.