Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW)
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and The Charles Schwab Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: BKNG is classified in Consumer Cyclical; SCHW is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$173.92Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
$107.25Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BKNG vs SCHW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBKNG +215.3% (+12.2%/yr)SCHW +296.7% (+14.8%/yr)SCHW compounded faster over this window
BKNG SCHW
BKNG vs SCHW: by the numbers
- •SCHW is the larger company ($186.52B vs $134.77B market cap).
- •BKNG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.29 vs 19.50 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SCHW converts more revenue to profit (33.62% vs 25.53% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.52% vs 13.03% CAGR).
- •SCHW pays the higher dividend yield (1.15% vs 0.92%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.29 | 19.50 |
| Forward P/E | 16.64 | 16.51 |
| P/S ratio | 4.77 | 6.21 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 3.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.30 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 7.08% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00% | 86.67% |
| Operating margin | 34.49% | 43.49% |
| Net margin | 25.53% | 33.62% |
| ROE | N/A | 20.24% |
| ROIC | 71.23% | N/A |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | 1.15% |
| Payout ratio | 17.83% | 22.36% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 31.52% | 13.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62% | 17.05% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 56.15% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.07% | 9.51% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKNG or SCHW?
- BKNG has the lower trailing P/E: BKNG trades at 19.29 and SCHW at 19.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or SCHW?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 31.52% CAGR versus SCHW at 13.03%.
- Does BKNG or SCHW pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG yields 0.92% and SCHW yields 1.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKNG or SCHW more profitable?
- SCHW runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 25.53% versus SCHW at 33.62%.
- How have BKNG and SCHW total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BKNG delivered 12.15% and SCHW delivered 14.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioCharles Schwab P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldCharles Schwab dividend yieldBooking ROECharles Schwab ROEBooking operating marginCharles Schwab operating marginBooking revenue growthCharles Schwab revenue growthBooking free cash flow
Booking & Charles Schwab appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.